IJSER Home >> Journal >> IJSER
International Journal of Scientific and Engineering Research
ISSN Online 2229-5518
ISSN Print: 2229-5518 8    
Website: http://www.ijser.org
scirp IJSER >> Volume 3,Issue 8,August 2012
Designing Tangible Multimedia for Preschoolers based on Multimedia Design Theories
Full Text(PDF, )  PP.79-82  
Author(s)
Chau Kien Tsong, Toh Seong Chong, Zarina Samsudin
KEYWORDS
Dual-coding theory, cognitive theory, Mayer's cognitive theory of multimedia learning, Tangible multimedia, Tangible object, Preschooler.
ABSTRACT
Coupling of tangible objects and multimedia expression for preschool children has not taken place yet. The reasons could be the concern over possible physical clutter and confusion in display. The problem can be overcome by applying relevant multimedia design theories on the system. However, we have problem to find a design theory specifically used for leveraging tangible objects and multimedia objects. For the purpose of demonstrating the need of such design theory in a newly explored area, we divert our focus on the application of the well-established Cognitive Theory of Multimedia Learning, Dual-Coding and Cognitive Load theory. Such discussion serves as a grounding reference for other similar research in future. A relevant prototype named "TangiLearn" has been developed for a case study and the finding revealed that there is a need for specific full-fledged design guidelines in tangible multimedia.
References
[1] R.E.Mayer, Multimedia Learning,NY: Cambridge University Press, 2001.

[2] R.E.Mayer, “Cognitive Theory of Multimedia Learning,”In Mayer, R.E. (Ed.). The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning, pp. 1-16. New York: Cambridge, 2009.

[3] A. Paivio, Imagery and Verbal Processes. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1971.

[4] A. Paivio, Mental Representation: A Dual-coding Approach. New York: Oxford University Press, 1986.

[5] A. Paivio, “Dual-coding Theory: Retrospect and Current Status,” Canadian Journal of Psychology, vol. 45, pp. 255-287, 1991.

[6] J. Sweller, “Cognitive Load during Problem Solving: Effects on Learning,” Cognitive Science,vol. 12, pp. 257-285, 1988.

[7] J. Sweller, “Cognitive Load Theory, Learning Difficulty and Instructional Design,”Learning and Instruction, vol. 4, pp. 295-312, 1994.

[8] J. Sweller, Instructional Design in Technical Areas.Australian Council for Educational Research. Victoria, Australia: Camberwell, 1999.

[9] G.A. Miller, “The Magical Number Seven, Plus or Minus Two: Some Limits on Our Capacity for Processing Information,” Psychology Review, vol. 63, pp. 81-97, 1956.

[10] H. Ebbinghaus, Memory: A Contribution to Experimental Psychology, Teachers College. New York: Columbia University, 1913.

[11] S.E. Cooperstein and E. Kocevar-Weidinger, “Beyond Active Learning: A Constructivist Approach to Learning,”Reference Services Review,32(2), pp. 141- 148, 2004, doi:10.1108/00907320410537658.

[12] K.T. Chau, S.C. Toh, and Zarina Samsudin, “Enriching Multimedia Expression with Tangible Objects: The Learning Benefits for Preschoolers,”Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences,Elsevier, 2012. (submitted for publication)

[13] K.M.E. Burkes, “Applying Cognitive Load Theory to the Design of Online Learning,”PhD dissertation,University of North Texas, US, 2007.

[14] K.T. Chau, S.C. Toh, and Zarina Samsudin, “Tangible Multimedia Learning System: A Case Study for bringing Tangibility into Multimedia Learning for Preschool Children,” Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, Elsevier, 2012. (submitted for publication)

[15] K.T. Chau, S.C. Toh, and Zarina Samsudin, “Tangible Multimedia Technology: A Research Proposal for bringing Tangibility into Multimedia Learning amongst Preschool Children,” Proceeding of the 5th International MalaysianEducational Technology Convention (IMETC 2011),2011.

Untitled Page