IJSER Home >> Journal >> IJSER
International Journal of Scientific and Engineering Research
ISSN Online 2229-5518
ISSN Print: 2229-5518 4    
Website: http://www.ijser.org
scirp IJSER >> Volume 3,Issue 4,April 2012
Residents Awareness Towards Landslide Disaster In Penang
Full Text(PDF, )  PP.60-66  
Habibah Lateh, Vijaya Govindasamy
Minimum 7 disaster, environmental problem, knowledge, residents, awareness, Penang, landslide.
This study aims to identify the resident awareness of landslides disaster. The objective of the study is to identify the level of resident awareness of landslides disaster in Penang. A total of 240 people representing ten of each of the six districts in the state of Penang in the sample by simple random sampling method. Data collected is analyzed using the Statistical Package For Social Sciences (SPSS) using percentages and frequencies. The results showed that the level of resident awareness of landslides is moderate. This means that the government and political parties need to increase resident awareness of landslides disaster. In addition, the knowledge resident of landslides is moderate too. So still plenty of room for improvement to ensure a landslide awareness program carried out properly and transparently
[1] Bandura, A. Self-efficacy. New York: W. H. Freeman. 1997.

[2] Gibson, E. and Pick, A.D. An Ecological Approach to Perceptual Leaning and Development. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2000.

[3] Gibson, J.J. The Senses Considered as Perceptual Systems. Boston, MA: Houghton-Mifflin. 1966.

[4] Gibson, J. J. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Boston: Houghton- Mifflin. 1979.

[5] Chan, N.W. “Environmental hazards associated with hill land development in Penang Island, Malaysia: Some recommendations on effective management”. Emerald Disaster Prevention and Management 7(4): 305-318. 1998.v [6] Abdullah C.H., Mohamad A., Yusof M.A.M., Gue S.S. & Mahmud M. “Development of Slope Management in Malaysia”. 2007.

[7] Stern, P. C. Psychology, sustainability, and the science of humanenvironment interactions. American Psychologist, 55, 523–530. 2000.

[8] Silverstein, M. Disasters. McClean, VA: Brassey’s. 1992.

[9] Oskamp, 5, Attitudes and opinions. anglewood Cliffs, NJ: PrenticeHall, 1977.

[10] Gue, S. S. & Tan Y. C. "Landslides: Abuses of The Prescriptive Method", Internationals Conference on slope 2006, Kuala Lumpur, 7 - 8 August 2006. 2006.

[11] Bem, D.J. Beliefs, attitudes and human affairs. Belmont, California: Brooks/Cole, 1970.

[12] Mirovitskaya, N. and Ascher, W. Guide to sustainable development and environmental policy. London: Duke University Press. 2001.

[13] Dunlap, R.E. & Dillman, D.A. Decline in public support for environmental protection: Evidence from a 1970-1974 panel study. Rural Sociology. 41, 382-390. 1976.

[14] Keating M. Agenda for Change : A Plain Language Version of Agenda 21 and Other Rio agreements, Centre for our Common Future, Geveve, Switzerland, 70 p. 1993.

[15] Pettus, A. Environmental education and environmental attitudes. Journal of Environmental Education. 8, 48-51. 1976.

[16] Cohen, M.R. Environmental information versus environmental attitudes. Journal of Environmental Education, 5,5-8. 1973.

[17] Young, R.A. The relationship between information levels and environmental approval: The wilderness issue. Journal of Environmental Education. 11(3), 25-30. 1980.

[18] Burris-Bammel, L.L. Information’s effect on attitude: A longitudinal study. Journal of Environmental Education, 9 (4). 1978.

[19] Mitchell, R.C. Silent spring/solid majorities. Public Opinion. Aug/Sept.,16-20. 1979.

[20] Thompson, R.L. Incentives for sustainable agriculture and rural development. In (S.A. Brett, ed.) Integration of Sustainable Agriculture and Rural Development Issues in Agricultural Policy, pp. 87-99. Winrock International, Morrilton, Arkansas. 1996.

Untitled Page