IJSER Home >> Journal >> IJSER
International Journal of Scientific and Engineering Research
ISSN Online 2229-5518
ISSN Print: 2229-5518 4    
Website: http://www.ijser.org
scirp IJSER >> Volume 3,Issue 4,April 2012
Impact of Biotic Interferences on Yousmarg Forest Ecosystem, Kashmir
Full Text(PDF, )  PP.24-36  
Yousmarg forest, ecosystem, biotic interferences, vegetation analysis, medicinal plants, vegetation cover and exploitation
The present investigation of forest ecosystem was undertaken during May 20R0 to Dec 20R0. The main aim of the study was to analyze the impact of biotic interferences on Yousmarg forest ecosystem. The cumulative effect of the biotic interferences was significantly seen in the reduction of vegetation cover. The present study revealed that the prominent factor for the exploitation of the vegetation cover of the study area at herbaceous level is simply the overgrazing. The increasing disturbances not only disturb the plant species diversity, richness and evenness significantly but various plant species have been got completely eliminated from grazing area by different kinds of interferences like overgrazing, deforestation, forest fire, tourist impacts etc. It has been observed that about I0 species were absent in the grazing area where as all species were present in the fenced (protected) area .Most of the species have medicinal value like Achillea millefolium, Fragaria nubicola, Taraxacum officinale, Prunella vulgaris, Potentilla reptans, Rumex hastatus, etc. The data showed that the importance value index (IVI) of Pinus wallichiana at all the three sites like Nabrepather, Mashid Nar and Chota Yous of Yousmarg area, gets constantly decrease from protected site to unprotected site while as there is overall decrease in the IVI of other two species like Picea smithana (spruce) and Abies pindrow (fir).
[1] Mathur, H. N., Singh, R. P and Gupta, M. K. (1992). Comparative Study of infiltration in soil under forest cover and agriculture in temperate climate. Indian For., 108 (10): 648-652

[2] Lone, H. A. and Pandit, A. K. (2005). Impact of deforestation on some economical important tree species of Langate forest division in Kashmir Himalaya. J. Res.Dev., 5: 39 -44.

[3] West Virginia University Extension Service Overgrazing Can Hurt Environment, Your Pocketbook Ed Rayburn. 2000.

[4] Misra, R. 1968. Ecology Workbook. Oxford and I.B.H. publishing Co., New Delhi.

[5] Kershaw, K.R. (1973): Quantitative and Dynamic Plant Ecology. Edward Arnold Ltd., London.

[6] Shannon, C. E. and Wiener, W., (1963): The Mathematical Theory of Communication. University Press, Illinois, USA.

[7] Simpson, E.H. (1949): Measurement of diversity. Nature, 163: 688.

[8] Pielou, E.C., (1975): Ecological Diversity. John Wiley and Sons. New York

[9] Margalef, D, .R. (1958). Information theory in ecology. Year book of the Society for General Systems Research. 3: 36-71.

[10] Sorenson, T. (1948). A method of establishing groups of equal amplitude in a plant based on similarity of species content. K. Dan. Vidensk. Selsk.5: 1 –34

[11] Vesk, P.A., and Westoby, M. (2000). Predicting plant species responses to grazing. J. Applied Ecol., 38: 897-909.

[12] Sher, H., Khan, Z.D., Khan, A.U. and Hussain, F. (2005). In situ conservation of some selected medicinal plants of UpperSwat, Pakistan. J. Acta Botanica Yunnanica, 27: 27-36.

[13] Kukshal, S., Nautiyal, B.P., Anthwa I.A., Sharma, A. and Bhatt, A.B., 2006. Phytosociological investigation and life form pattern of grazing lands under pine canopy in temperate zone, Northwest Himalaya, India. Res. J. Botany, 4: 55-69.

[14] Skornik, M. vidrih and M. kaligaric, (2010). The effect of grazing pressure on species richness, composition and productivity in North Adriatic Karst pastures. Plant biosystems.144 (2): 355–364.

[15] Mushtaq, B. and Pandit, A. K. (2010). Impact of biotic factor on the vegetation of Shankeracharya forest ecosystem. J. Himalayan Ecol. Sustain. Dev.5 (5): 39 -44.

[16] Kumar, M., Sharma C.M. and Rajwar, G.S.2004. A study on the community structure and diversity of a sub-tropical forest of Garhwal Himalayas. Indian Forester, 130(2): 207-214.

[17] Rajwar, G.S. and Gupta, S.K., (1992). Structure of forest vegetation of Garhwal Siwalik Hills between Khoh and Ganga. Indian Forester, 118 (2): 148-165.

[18] Mishra, A., Mishra, L., Sharma, C.M. and Sharma, S.D. (2002). Community structure and growing stock variation on different aspects of dry semi-evergreen Shorea Robusta forest cover type of Garhwal Himalaya. Annals of Forestry, 10(2): 233-242.

[19] Curtis, J. T. and McIntosh, R. P. 1951. The inter-relation of certain analytic and synthetic Phytosociological character.Ecol.31: 343-455.

[20] Mishra, R.K., Upadhyay, V. P. and Mohanty. R.C. (2003). Vegetation diversity of Similipalbiosphere reserve. E-Planet.1 (1): 4-9.

[21] Wali, M. K. (1964). A Preliminary survey of the conifer community of Kashmir Himalaya. Tropical Ecology, 5:32-41.

[22] Islam, K. R. and Weil R. R., 2001. Land-use effects on soil quality in a tropical forest ecosystem of Bangladesh. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 79: 9-16.

[23] Aweto A. O., Adejumbi, D. O. 1991. Impact of grazing on soil in the Southern Guinea Savannah Zone of Nigeria. The Environmentalist.11: 27-32.

[24] Dagar J. C., Mongia A. D., Singh N. T., 1995. Degradation of tropical rain forest soils upon replacement with plantations and arable crops in Andaman and Nicobar Islands in India. Tropical Ecology, 36: 89-101.

[25] Weert, V. A., (1974). The influence of mechanical forest clearing on soil conditions and resulting effects on root growth. Tropical Agriculture (Trinidad), 51: 325-33.

[26] Chauvel, A., Grimaldi, M. and Tessier, D. 1991. Changes in soil porespace distribution following deforestation and regeneration: An example from the central Amazon Basin, Brazil. Forest Ecology and Management, 38: 259-271.

Untitled Page