IJSER Home >> Journal >> IJSER
International Journal of Scientific and Engineering Research
ISSN Online 2229-5518
ISSN Print: 2229-5518 6    
Website: http://www.ijser.org
scirp IJSER >> Volume 2, Issue 6, June 2011 Edition
Analysis of Software Cost Estimation using COCOMO II
Full Text(PDF, 3000)  PP.  
Author(s)
T.N.Sharma
KEYWORDS
Software Cost Estimation, COCOMO II, Scale Factors, Cost Drivers, Case Studies.
ABSTRACT
COCOMO II is an objective cost model for planning and executing software projects. It is an important ingredient for managing software projects or software lines of business. A cost model provides a framework for communicating business decisions among the stakeholders of a software effort. COCOMO II supports contract negotiations, process improvement analysis, tool purchases, architecture changes, component make/buy tradeoffs and several other return-on-investment decisions with a credible basis of estimate. COCOMO II incorporates several field-tested improvements to both broaden its applicability and improve its estimating accuracy for modern software development approaches. COCOMO II includes two underlying information models. The first is a framework for describing a software project, including models for process, culture, stakeholders, methods, tools and the size/complexity of the software product. The second is an experience base that can be used to estimate the likely includes significant updates to COCOMO to improve its applicability to modern processes, methods, tools and technologies. It also includes a much larger, more pertinent database of modern precedents and improves the adaptability of the model so it can be optimized across a broad spectrum of domains and project circumstances. This paper presents cost estimation of various projects using COCOMO II. This article also presents statistical analysis for relevance of base COCOMO II model for effort estimation in present scenario.
References
1. Arlene F. Minkiewicz, The Evolution of Software Size: A Search for Value, CrossTalk, The Journal of Defense Software Engineering, April 2009 p.p. 23-26

2. Basavaraj, M.J. and Shet, K.C. (2008). Empirical Validation of Software Development effort multiplier of Intermediate COCOMO Model. Journal of Software, vol.3, No. 5 pp. 65-71.

3. Boehm Barry (2000). Software Cost Estimation using COCOMO. Prentice Hall, US.

4. Barry Boehm, Ricardo Valerdi, COCOMO Suite Methodology and Evolution CROSSTALK The Journal of Defense Software April 2005, p.p. 20- 25

5. Coe, David j. Improving Consistency of Use Case Points Estimates. CrossTalk, The Journal of Defense Software Engineering, March 2008 pp 8-12

6. Demirors, O.; Gencel, C, Conceptual Association of Functional Size Measurement Methods , IEEE Society, Volume 26, Issue 3, May-June 2009 p.p. 71 – 78

7. Evans Michael, Alex Abela, and Tom Beltz(2002). Seven Characteristics of Dysfunctional Software Projects. The Journal of Defense Software Engineering.

8. Ye Yang, Zhihao Chen, Ricardo Valerdi, Barry Boehm, """"Effect of Schedule Compression on Project Effort"""", CSSE Tech Report, 2005

Untitled Page