International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 2, Issue 1, January-2011 1

ISSN 2229-5518

Importance of Intrusion Detection System (IDS)

Asmaa Shaker Ashoor (Department computer science, Pune University) Prof. Sharad Gore (Head department statistic, Pune University)

Abstract: Intruders computers, who are spread across the Internet have become a major threat in our world, The researchers proposed a number of techniques such as (firewall, encryption) to prevent such penetration and protect the infrastructure of computers, but with this, the intruders managed to penetrate the computers. IDS has taken much of the attention of researchers, IDS monitors the resources computer and sends reports on the activities of any anomaly or strange patterns. The aim of this paper is to explain the stages of the evolution of the idea of IDS and its importance to researchers and research centres, security, military and to examine the importance of intrusion detection systems and categories , classifications, and where can put IDS to reduce the risk to the network.

Keywords: Intrusion detection, IDS, anomaly & misuse, NID

—————————— • ——————————

INTRODUCTION

Security is an important issue for all the networks of companies and institutions at the present time and all the intrusions are trying in ways that successful access to the data network of these companies and Web services and despite the development of multiple ways to ensure that the infiltration of intrusion to the infrastructure of the network via the Internet, through the use of firewalls, encryption, etc.
But IDS is a relatively new technology of the techniques for intrusion detection methods that have emerged in recent years. Intrusion detection system’s main role in a network is to help computer systems to prepare and deal with the network attacks.
Intrusion detection functions include:

• Monitoring and analyzing both user and system activities

• Analyzing system configurations and vulnerabilities

• Assessing system and file integrity

• Ability to recognize patterns typical of attacks

• Analysis of abnormal activity patterns

• Tracking user policy violations

The purpose of IDS is to help computer systems on how to deal with attacks, and that IDS is collecting information from several different sources within the computer systems and networks and compares this information with pre-
existing patterns of discrimination as to whether there are attacks or weaknesses.

INTRUSION DETECTION SYSTEMS: A BRIEF HISTORY

The goal of intrusion detection is to monitor network assets to detect anomalous behaviour and misuse in network. This concept has been around for nearly twenty years but only recently has it seen a dramatic rise in popularity and incorporation into the overall information security infrastructure. Beginning in 1980, with James Anderson's paper, Computer Security Threat Monitoring and Surveillance, the intrusion detection was born. Since then, several polar events in IDS technology have advanced intrusion detection to its current state.
James Anderson's seminal paper, was written for a government organization, introduced the notion that audit trails contained vital information that could be valuable in tracking misuse and understanding of user behaviour. With the release of this paper, the concept of "detecting" misuse and specific user events emerged. His insight into audit data and its importance led to tremendous improvements in the auditing subsystems of virtually every operating system. Anderson's hypothesize also provided the foundation for future intrusion detection sstem design and development. His work was the start of host-based intrusion detection and IDS in general.
In 1983, SRI International, and Dr. Dorothy Denning, began working on a government project that launched a new effort into intrusion detection system development. Their goal was to analyze audit trails from government mainframe computers and create profiles of users based
IJSER © 2010 http://www.ijser.org

International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 2, Issue 1, January-2011 2

ISSN 2229-5518

upon their activities. One year later, Dr. Denning helped to develop the first model for intrusion detection, the Intrusion Detection Expert System (IDES), which provided the foundation for the IDS technology development that was soon to follow.
In 1984, SRI also developed a means of tracking and analyzing audit data containing authentication information of users on ARPANET, the original Internet. Soon after, SRI completed a Navy SPAWAR contract with the realization of the first functional intrusion detection system, IDES. Using her research and development work at SRI, Dr. Denning published the decisive work, An Intrusion Detection Model, which revealed the necessary information for commercial intrusion detection system development. Her paper is the basis for most of the work in IDS that followed. The subsequent iteration of this tool was called the Distributed Intrusion Detection System (DIDS). DIDS augmented the existing solution by tracking client machines as well as the servers it originally monitored. Finally in 1989, the developers from the Haystack project formed the commercial company, Haystack Labs, and released the last generation of the technology, Stalker. Crosby Marks says that "Stalker was a host-based, pattern matching system that included robust search capabilities to manually and automatically query the audit data." The Haystack advances, coupled with the work of SRI and Denning, greatly advanced the development of host-based intrusion detection technologies.
Commercial development of intrusion detection technologies began in the early 1990s. Haystack Labs was the first commercial vendor of IDS tools, with its Stalker line of host-based products. SAIC was also developing a form of host-based intrusion detection, called Computer Misuse Detection System (CMDS). Simultaneously, the Air Force's Crypto logic Support Canter developed the Automated Security Measurement System (ASIM) to monitor network traffic on the US Air Force's network. ASIM made considerable progress in overcoming scalability and portability issues that previously plagued NID products. Additionally, ASIM was the first solution to incorporate both a hardware and software solution to network intrusion detection. ASIM is still currently in use and managed by the Air Force's Computer Emergency Response Team (AFCERT) at locations all over the world. As often happened, the development group on the ASIM project formed a commercial company in 1994, the Wheel Group. Their product, Net Ranger, was the first commercially viable network intrusion detection device.
The intrusion detection market began to gain in popularity and truly generate revenues around 1997. In that year, the security market leader, ISS, developed a network intrusion
detection system called Real Secure. A year later, Cisco recognized the importance of network intrusion detection and purchased the Wheel Group, attaining a security solution they could provide to their customers. Similarly, the first visible host-based intrusion detection company, Centrex Corporation, emerged as a result of a merger of the development staff from Haystack Labs and the departure of the CMDS team from SAIC. From there, the commercial IDS world expanded its market-base and a roller coaster ride of start-up companies, mergers, and acquisitions ensued.

Figure 1: Number of incidents reported

The above chart from US-CERT shows how the cyber incidents rose in current internet network environment; this gives requirement of IDS deployment in network security model.
Network intrusion detection actually deals with information passing on the wire between hosts. Typically referred to as "packet-sniffers," network intrusion detection devices intercept packets travelling in and out in network along various communication mediums and protocols, usually TCP/IP. Once captured, the packets are analyzed in a number of different ways. Some IDS devices will simply compare the packet to a signature database consisting of known attacks and malicious packet "fingerprints", while others will look for anomalous packet activity that might indicate malicious behaviour.
IJSER © 2010 http://www.ijser.org

International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 2, Issue 1, January-2011 3

ISSN 2229-5518

Figure 2: Vulnerabilities reported

The IDS basically monitors network traffic for activity that falls within the banned activity in the network. The IDS main job is gives alert to network admins for allow them to take corrective action, blocking access to vulnerable ports, denying access to specific IP address or shutting down services used to allow attacks. This is nothing but front line weapon in the network admins war against hackers. This information is then compared with predefined blueprints of known attacks and vulnerabilities.

Categories of intrusion detection system

Intrusion detection system is classified into three categories: signature based detection systems, anomaly based detection systems and specification based detection systems.

1. Signature based detection systems

Signature based detection system (also called misuse based)
, This type of detection is very effective against known
attacks, and it depends on the receiving of regular updates
of patterns and will be unable to detect unknown previous
threats or new releases.

2. Anomaly based detection system

This type of detection depends on the classification of the network to the normal and anomalous, as this classification is based on rules or heuristics rather than patterns or signatures and the implementation of this system we first need to know the normal behaviour of the network.
Anomaly based detection system unlike the misuse based detection system because it can detect previous unknown threats, But the false positive to rise more probably.

3. Specification based detection system

This type of detection systems is responsible for monitoring the processes and matching the actual data with the program and in case of any Abnormal behaviour will be issued an alert and must be maintained and updated whenever a change was made on the surveillance programs in order to be able to detect the previous attacks the unknown and the number of false positives what can be less than the anomaly detection system approach.

CLASSIFICATION OF INTRUSION DETECTION SYSTEM

Intrusion detection system are classified into three types
1. Host based IDS
2. Network based IDS
3. Hybrid based IDS

1. Host based IDS (HIDS)

This type is placed on one device such as server or workstation, where the data is analyzed locally to the machine and are collecting this data from different sources. HIDS can use both anomaly and misuse detection system.

2. Network based IDS (NIDS)

NIDS are deployed on strategic point in network infrastructure. The NIDS can capture and analyze data to detect known attacks by comparing patterns or signatures of the database or detection of illegal activities by scanning traffic for anomalous activity. NIDS are also referred as “packet-sniffers”, Because it captures the packets passing through the of communication mediums.

3. Hybrid based IDS

The management and alerting from both network and host- based intrusion detection devices, and provide the logical complement to NID and HID - central intrusion detection management.
IJSER © 2010 http://www.ijser.org

International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 2, Issue 1, January-2011 4

ISSN 2229-5518

Figure3: Layered Security approach for reducing risk:

CONCLUSION

An intrusion detection system is a part of the defensive operations that complements the defences such as firewalls, UTM etc. The intrusion detection system basically detects attack signs and then alerts. According to the detection methodology, intrusion detection systems are typically categorized as misuse detection and anomaly detection systems. The deployment perspective, they are be classified in network based or host based IDS. In current intrusion detection systems where information is collected from both network and host resources. In terms of performance, an intrusion detection system becomes more accurate as it detects more attacks and raises fewer false positive alarms.

REFERENCES

[1] Anderson, James P., “Computer Security Threat Monitoring and

Surveillance”,Fort Washington, Pa., 1980.

[2] D. E. Denning, "An intrusion-detection model." IEEE Transactions on

Software Engineering, Vol. SE-13(No. 2):222-232, Feb. 1987.

[3] Heberlein, L. etal. "A Network Security Monitor." Proceedings of the IEEE Computer Society Symposium, Research in Security and Privacy, May 1990, pp.

296-303.

[4] Paul Innella Tetrad, “The Evolution of Intrusion Detection Systems”, Digital

Integrity,LLC on November 16, 2001.

[5] Harley Kozushko, “Intrusion Detection: Host-Based and Network-Based

Intrusion Detection Systems”, on September 11, 2003.

IJSER © 2010 http://www.ijser.org