International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 3, Issue 2, February-2012 1

ISSN 2229-5518

Elastic Properties of substituted 45S5 Bioactive

Glasses and Glass - Ceramics

Ankesh Kumar Srivastava, Ram Pyare and S. P. Singh

Abstract — CuO, Fe2O3, MnO2 and ZnO substituted 45S5 bioactive - glasses were prepared. Glass - derived Bioactive Glass - ceramics were obtained through controlled crystallization of bioactive glasses. The formed crystalline phases in bioactive glass - ceramics were identified using X - ray diffraction (XRD) analysis. Density and ultrasonic wave velocities of bioactive glasses and glass - ceramics were measured and used to study elastic properties: Young’s modulus, shear modulus, bulk modulus and Poisson’s ratio, of bioactive glasses and glass - ceramics.

The results indicate that the addition of CuO, Fe2O3, MnO2 and ZnO contents in 45S5 bioactive glass enhances its density and elastic properties. The bioactive glass - ceramics exhibits higher density and elastic properties when compared with their corresponding bioactive glasses.

Index Terms — Bioceramics, Bioactive Glasses, Bioactive Glass - ceramics, Physical Properties, Bioactivity, Mechanical Properties, Elastic Modulus,

Poisson’s ratio

—————————— ——————————

1 INTRODUCTION

The most widely researched bioactive material is 45S5 bioactive glass [Composition wt. % 45 SiO2 - 24.5 Na2O -
24.5 CaO - 6 P2O5], where S denotes the network former SiO2 in 45% by weight followed by a specific Ca/P molar ratio 5 [1]. It was invented by Hench in 1969. The key compositional features that are responsible for the bioactivity of 45S5 bioactive glass are its low SiO2 (glass network former) content, high Na2O and CaO (glass network modifiers) content, and high CaO/P2O5 ratio [2].
An ideal bioactive material requires both good biochemical and biomechanical compatibility. A particular advantage of
45S5 bioactive glass is its ability to bond to both hard and
soft tissues [3]. However, a disadvantage of 45S5 bioactive glass is its brittleness. As a consequence, it has poor mechanical properties and is generally restricted to clinical non - load bearing situation [4].
The mechanical strength of a glass depends on its elastic
properties, shape, surface/internal defects and the character of the force to which it is subjected. These factors inevitably degrade the mechanical strength of a material to 1/10 or lower of its intrinsic (theoretical) strength [5]. Thus, one cannot obtain the intrinsic strength by using destructive mechanical test on a big specimen. The ultrasonic non - destructive testing has been found to be one of the best techniques to study the elastic properties of glasses.
The present work aims to measure the density and ultrasonic wave velocities (both longitudinal and shear) for CuO, Fe2O3, MnO2 and ZnO substituted 45S5 bioactive glasses and glass - ceramics. These values have been used to evaluate Young’s, bulk and shear modulus and Poisson’s ratio of bioactive glasses and glass - ceramics.

2 EXPERIMENTAL

2.1 Preparation of Bioactive Glasses and Glass - ceramics

Fine grained quartz was used as the source of SiO2 while Na2O and CaO were introduced in the form of anhydrous sodium carbonate [Na2CO3] and anhydrous calcium carbonate [CaCO3] respectively, P2O5 was added in the form of ammonium dihydrogen orthophosphate [NH4H2PO4] and CuO, Fe2O3, MnO2 and ZnO was added as such for preparation of bioactive glasses. All the batch materials were of analytical grade chemicals and used without further purification. The compositions of bioactive glasses are given in Table 1. The weighed batches were melted in alumina crucibles for 3 hours in an electric furnace at the temperature 1400 ± 10 0C. The homogeneous melts were cast into preheated stainless steel moulds of the required dimensions. The prepared bioactive glass samples were directly transferred to a regulated muffle furnace at the temperature 500 0C for annealing. After 1 h, the muffle furnace was left to cool to room temperature at a rate of 30

0C/ h.

In order to obtain the bioactive glass - ceramics, the bioactive glass samples were heated in the muffle furnace in two step regime at the deduced temperatures and times as shown in Table 2. These temperatures were obtained from differential thermal analysis (DTA) of bioactive glasses. Each bioactive glass sample was heated slowly to the first nucleation temperature for the formation of sufficient nuclei sites and after holding for the definite time, was then further heated to reach the second chosen crystal growth temperature for performing the perfect crystal growth process and after a second hold for the specific time, the sample was left to cool inside the muffle furnace to room temperature at a rate of 20 0C/h.

IJSER © 2012 http://www.ijser.org

International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 3, Issue 2, February-2012 2

ISSN 2229-5518

Table 1: Composition of bioactive glasses

Code for glasses

Composition (wt %)

CuO substituted 45S5 bioactive glasses

SiO2

Na2O

CaO

P2O5

CuO

C1

44.00

24.50

24.50

6.00

1.00

C2

43.00

24.50

24.50

6.00

2.00

C3

42.00

24.50

24.50

6.00

3.00

C4

41.00

24.50

24.50

6.00

4.00

Fe2O3 substituted 45S5 bioactive glasses

SiO2

Na2O

CaO

P2O5

Fe2O3

F1

44.00

24.50

24.50

6.00

1.00

F2

43.00

24.50

24.50

6.00

2.00

F3

42.00

24.50

24.50

6.00

3.00

F4

41.00

24.50

24.50

6.00

4.00

MnO2 substituted 45S5 bioactive glasses

SiO2

Na2O

CaO

P2O5

MnO2

M1

44.00

24.50

24.50

6.00

1.00

M2

43.00

24.50

24.50

6.00

2.00

M3

42.00

24.50

24.50

6.00

3.00

M4

41.00

24.50

24.50

6.00

4.00

ZnO substituted 45S5 bioactive glasses

SiO2

Na2O

CaO

P2O5

ZnO

Z1

44.00

24.50

24.50

6.00

1.00

Z2

43.00

24.50

24.50

6.00

2.00

Z3

42.00

24.50

24.50

6.00

3.00

Z4

41.00

24.50

24.50

6.00

4.00

Base 45S5 bioactive glass

SiO2

Na2O

CaO

P2O5

45S5

44.00

24.50

24.50

6.00

IJSER © 2012 http://www.ijser.org

International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 3, Issue 2, February-2012 3

ISSN 2229-5518


Table 2: Heat treatment schedule for crystallization of bioactive glasses

Sample

Nucleation

Growth

Temperature (0C)

Time (hours)

Temperature (0C)

Time (hours)

CuO substituted 45S5 bioactive glasses

C1

518

6

675

3

C2

510

6

651

3

C3

504

6

631

3

C4

499

6

616

3

Fe2O3 substituted 45S5 bioactive glasses

F1

527

6

682

3

F2

523

6

665

3

F3

519

6

650

3

F4

516

6

640

3

MnO2 substituted 45S5 bioactive glasses

M1

525

6

678

3

M2

520

6

657

3

M3

517

6

640

3

M4

514

6

627

3

ZnO substituted 45S5 bioactive glasses

Z1

528

6

686

3

Z2

524

6

671

3

Z3

521

6

661

3

Z4

518

6

651

3

Base 45S5 bioactive glass

45S5

533

6

717

3

IJSER © 2012 http://www.ijser.org

International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 3, Issue 2, February-2012 4

ISSN 2229-5518

2.2 X - Ray Diffraction (XRD) Analysis

Identification of the crystalline phases after heat - treatment of bioactive glass samples was carried out by X - ray diffraction (XRD) analysis. The bioactive glass - ceramics were examined using a X - ray diffractometer, adopting Ni filter and Cu target with voltage of 40 KV and a current of
25 mA. The XRD patterns were recorded in a 2θ range of 10
- 700. The JCPDS - International Center for Diffraction Data
Cards was used as a reference data for the interpretation of
XRD patterns in the present work.

2.3 Density Measurements

Archimedes principle was employed to obtain the density of bioactive glass and glass - ceramic samples using distilled water as buoyant. All the weight measurements have been made using a digital balance having an accuracy of ± 0.0001 g. Density of sample was obtained employing the relation [6] given below [6]:

where is the weight of sample in air, is the weight of sample in buoyant and is the density of buoyant.

2.4 Elastic Properties Measurements

The ultrasonic wave velocities propagated in the polished bioactive glass and glass - ceramic specimens were obtained by measuring the elapsed time between the initiation and the receipt of the pulse appearing on the screen of an ultrasonic flaw detector via a standard electronic circuit. The size of the specimen was 20 mm x 10 mm x 3 mm according to ASTM Standard: E494 - 10. Two quartz transducers in this machine, which are X - cut transducer and Y - cut transducer, with has a resonant frequency of 5
MHz and acts as transmitter - receiver at the same time, were required to generate longitudinal and transverse ultrasonic waves respectively Burnt honey was used as bonding material between samples and transducers. The ultrasonic wave velocity can be calculated using the following equation [7]:

where is the sample thickness and is the time interval. The elastic strain in an amorphous solid (such as glass) generated by a minor stress, can be described by two independent elastic constants, and [8]. For pure longitudinal ultrasonic waves, and for pure transverse ultrasonic waves, , where and , respectively, are the longitudinal and transverse ultrasonic wave velocities. Elastic properties: Young’s modulus , shear modulus , bulk modulus and Poisson’s ratio
, can be obtained by density and longitudinal
and shear ultrasonic wave velocities by using the following standard equations [9]:


3 RESULTS

3.1. X - Ray Diffraction (XRD) Analysis

The X - ray diffraction (XRD) patterns for CuO substituted
45S5 bioactive glass - ceramics are shown in Figure 1. The XRD patterns of all the bioactive glass - ceramics show the presence of crystalline phase of sodium calcium silicate [Na2Ca2 Si3O9 (card number: PDF # 01 - 1078 & PDF # 02 -
0961), Na2CaSi3O8 (card number: PDF # 12 - 0671)]. Each CuO substituted bioactive glass - ceramics (C1, C2, C3 and C4) also, show the presence of crystalline phase of calcium silicate [CaSiO3 (card number: PDF # 42 - 0550)].

3.2 Density Measurements

Experimental values of density of bioactive glasses and glass ceramics are given in Table 3. It has been observed that the increase of CuO, Fe2O3, MnO2 and ZnO contents in the base bioactive glass (45S5) causes an increase in its density. It also has been observed that the density of bioactive glass - ceramics are higher than their respective bioactive glasses.

3.3 Elastic Properties Measurements

Values of longitudinal and shear ultrasonic wave velocities of investigated bioactive glasses and glass - ceramics are given in Table 3 while values of Young’s, shear and bulk modulus and Poisson’s ratio are listed in Table 4. Variation in Young’s, shear and bulk modulus and Poisson’s ratio of investigated bioactive glasses and glass - ceramics are shown in Figures 2, 3, 4 and 5 respectively. Both longitudinal and shear ultrasonic wave velocities and Young’s, shear and bulk modulus of base bioactive glass (45S5) increases with the incorporation of CuO, Fe2O3, MnO2 and ZnO contents in it.while a slight decrease in Poisson’s ratio was obtained. It also has been founded that the crystallization of bioactive glasses increases their both longitudinal and shear ultrasonic wave velocities, Young’s, shear and bulk modulus while decreases the Poisson’s ratio.

IJSER © 2012 http://www.ijser.org

International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 3, Issue 2, February-2012 5

ISSN 2229-5518

C4

C3

;::i "'

"'

rfl

'l)

:8

C2

"'

"'"' "'

Cl

45S5

10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70

28 (degree)

[..q Na Ca Sip

[ Na CaSip

[1ft CaSi0

2 2 9 2 8 3

Figure 1: XRD Patterns for CuO

ceramics

IJSER !b) 2012

http://www.ijser. org

substituted 4555 bioactive glass-

International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 3, Issue 2, February-2012 6

ISSN 2229-5518

Table 3: Density , longitudinal velocity and transverse velocity

of bioactive glasses and glass ceramics

Sample

Glasses

Glass - ceramics

(g/cm3) (m/s) (m/s)

(g/cm3)

(m/s)

(m/s)

CuO substituted 45S5 bioactive glasses

CuO substituted 45S5 bioactive glasses - ceramics

C1

2.732 5915 3370

2.943

6519

3744

C2

2.742 5927 3381

2.954

6531

3757

C3

2.759 5940 3394

2.972

6547

3772

C4

2.772 5961 3411

2.986

6569

3789

Fe2O3 substituted 45S5 bioactive glasses

Fe2O3 substituted 45S5 bioactive glasses - ceramics

F1

2.723 5913 3368

2.925

6517

3743

F2

2.731 5925 3380

2.932

6530

3755

F3

2.746 5937 3393

2.946

6544

3770

F4

2.757 5958 3409

2.956

6562

3784

MnO2 substituted 45S5 bioactive glasses

MnO2 substituted 45S5 bioactive glasses - ceramics

M1

2.738 5927 3382

2.937

6533

3761

M2

2.749 5941 3397

2.947

6550

3775

M3

2.767 5965 3415

2.964

6571

3793

M4

2.781 5983 3431

2.977

6587

3807

ZnO substituted 45S5 bioactive glasses

ZnO substituted 45S5 bioactive glasses - ceramics

Z1

2.727 5912 3366

2.928

6515

3741

Z2

2.736 5921 3379

2.936

6527

3752

Z3

2.752 5933 3387

2.951

6541

3766

Z4

2.764 5947 3400

2.962

6556

3780

Base 45S5 bioactive glass

Base 45S5 bioactive glass - ceramics

45S5

2.707 5904 3353

2.912

6507

3728

IJSER © 2012 http://www.ijser.org

International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 3, Issue 2, February-2012 7

ISSN 2229-5518

Table 4: Young’s modulus , shear modulus , bulk modulus and Poisson’s ratio

of bioactive glasses and glass ceramics

Sample

Glasses

Glass - ceramics

(GPa) (GPa) (GPa)

(GPa)

(GPa)

(GPa)

CuO substituted 45S5 bioactive glasses

CuO substituted 45S5 bioactive glasses - ceramics

C1

78.10 31.02 54.22 0.259

103.37

41.25

70.06

0.253

C2

78.85 31.34 54.53 0.258

104.39

41.69

70.40

0.252

C3

79.89 31.78 54.96 0.257

105.78

42.28

71.00

0.251

C4

81.01 32.25 55.49 0.256

107.15

42.86

71.70

0.250

Fe2O3 substituted 45S5 bioactive glasses

Fe2O3 substituted 45S5 bioactive glasses - ceramics

F1

77.75 30.88 54.02 0.259

102.67

40.97

69.59

0.253

F2

78.49 31.20 54.27 0.258

103.51

41.34

69.90

0.252

F3

79.46 31.61 54.64 0.257

104.75

41.87

70.32

0.251

F4

80.45 32.03 55.15 0.256

105.80

42.32

70.85

0.250

MnO2 substituted 45S5 bioactive glasses

MnO2 substituted 45S5 bioactive glasses - ceramics

M1

78.77 31.31 54.43 0.258

104.01

41.54

69.96

0.252

M2

79.74 31.72 54.72 0.257

105.05

41.99

70.44

0.251

M3

81.03 32.26 55.43 0.256

106.60

42.64

71.11

0.250

M4

82.15 32.73 55.90 0.255

107.76

43.14

71.64

0.249

ZnO substituted 45S5 bioactive glasses

ZnO substituted 45S5 bioactive glasses - ceramics

Z1

77.84 30.89 54.12 0.260

102.75

40.97

69.64

0.254

Z2

78.63 31.23 54.27 0.259

103.57

41.33

69.96

0.253

Z3

79.43 31.57 54.77 0.258

104.79

41.85

70.45

0.252

Z4

80.32 31.95 55.15 0.257

105.88

42.32

70.88

0.251

Base 45S5 bioactive glass

Base 45S5 bioactive glass - ceramics

45S5

76.74 30.43 53.77 0.261

101.57

40.47

69.33

0.255

IJSER © 2012 http://www.ijser.org

International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 3, Issue 2, February-2012 8

ISSN 2229-5518

110

105

Glasses

Glass - ceramics

110

105

Glasses

Glass - ceramics

100

100

95 95

90 90

85 85

80 80

75

0 1 2 3 4

Weight % of CuO

75

0 1 2 3 4

Weight % of Fe O

(A)

2 3

(B)

110

105

Glasses

Glass - ceramics

110

105

Glasses

Glass - ceramics

100

100

95 95

90 90

85 85

80 80

75

0 1 2 3 4

Weight % of MnO

2

(C)

75

0 1 2 3 4

Weight % of ZnO (D)

Figure 2: Variation in Young’s modulus for (A) CuO, (B) Fe2O3, (C) MnO2 and (D) ZnO substituted 45S5 bioactive glasses and
glass - ceramics

IJSER © 2012 http://www.ijser.org

International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 3, Issue 2, February-2012 9

ISSN 2229-5518

474

72

42

70

Glasses

Glass - ceramics

44

Glasses

Glass - ceramics

42

4608 40

66

38 38

64

36 36

60

3548 34

56

32 32

54

3502

0 1 2 3 4

Weight % of CuO

30

0 1 2 3 4

Weight % of Fe O

(A)

2 3

(B)

44

Glasses

Glass - ceramics

42

44

Glass

Glass - ceramics

42

40 40

38 38

36 36

34 34

32 32

30

0 1 2 3 4

Weight % of MnO

2

(C)

Figure 3: Variation in

30

0 1 2 3 4

Weight % of ZnO (D)

shear modulus for (A) CuO, (B) Fe2O3, (C) MnO2 and (D) ZnO substituted 45S5 bioactive glasses and glass - ceramics

IJSER © 2012 http://www.ijser.org

International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 3, Issue 2, February-2012 10

ISSN 2229-5518

0.262

0.261

0.260

0.259

0.258

0.257

0.256

0.255

0.254

0.253

0.252

0.251

0.250

0.249

0.248

Glasses

Glass - ceramics

0.26724

0.261

72

0.260

0.259

0.2568

0.25676

0.256

64

0.255

0.254

0.25630

0.2528

0.251

56

0.250

0.254

0.24582

Glasses

Glass - ceramics

Glasses

Glass - ceramics

0 1 2 3 4

Weight % of CuO

0 1 2 3 4

Weight % of Fe O

(A)

2 3

(B)

74

Glasses

72 Glass - ceramics

74

Glasses

72 Glass - ceramics

70 70

68 68

66 66

64 64

62 62

60 60

58 58

56 56

54 54

52

0 1 2 3 4

Weight % of MnO

2

(C)

Figure 4: Variation in bulk modulus for (A)

52

0 1 2 3 4

Weight % of ZnO (D)

CuO, (B) Fe2O3, (C) MnO2 and (D) ZnO substituted 45S5 bioactive glasses and glass - ceramics

IJSER © 2012 http://www.ijser.org

International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 3, Issue 2, February-2012 11

ISSN 2229-5518

0.262

0.261

0.260

0.259

0.258

0.257

0.256

0.255

0.254

0.253

0.252

0.251

0.250

0.249

0.248

Glasses

Glass - ceramics

0 1 2 3 4

Weight % of MnO

2

(C)

Figure 5: Variation in
Poisson’s ratio for (A)

0.262

0.261

0.260

0.259

0.258

0.257

0.256

0.255

0.254

0.253

0.252

0.251

0.250

0.249

0.248

Glasses

Glass - ceramics

0 1 2 3 4

Weight % of ZnO (D)

CuO, (B) Fe2O3, (C) MnO2 and (D) ZnO substituted 45S5 bioactive glasses and glass - ceramics

4 DISCUSSIONS

4.1 X – Ray Differaction (XRD) Analysis

The XRD patterns of all the bioactive glass - ceramics show the presence of crystalline phases. The reason for the ease of

IJSER © 2012

http://www.ijser.org

International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 3, Issue 2, February-2012 12

ISSN 2229-5518

crystallization of bioactive glasses can be correlated with
the presence of silicate and phosphate network, as well as the possible phase separation even in micro scale of the two phases on heat - treatment. It is well known that the addition of a few percentage of P2O5 to silicate glass compositions, promotes the volume nucleation and glass - ceramic formation [10]. There is some evidence for precipitation of phosphate crystals which subsequently act as heterogeneous nucleation sites for the subsequent crystallization of the major phases, although the detailed role of P2O5 remains to be discussed [11]. Previous studies [12], [13], [14] have shown that the heat - treatment of 45S5 bioactive glass at a nucleation temperature of 550 0C and followed by heating at a crystallization temperature of 680

0C produces a bioactive glass - ceramic containing the sodium calcium silicate [Na2Ca2Si3O9] as main crystallline phase. In all the bioactive glass - ceramics sodium calcium silicate [Na2Ca2 Si3O9 & Na2CaSi3O8] is present as main crystalline phase. Crystalline phase of calcium silicate [CaSiO3] is also observed in each CuO substituted bioactive glass - ceramics (C1, C2, C3 and C4). The studied bioactive glass - ceramics did not contain Cu, Fe, Mn and Zn as separate crystalline phases. This can be related to their relatively low content in bioactive glass composition.

4.2 Density Measurements

. The increase of CuO, Fe2O3, MnO2 and ZnO contents in the base bioactive glass (45S5) leads to an increase its density because of replacement of a lighter element, Si (density =
2.33 g/cm3) with a heavier element, Cu (density = 8.96
g/cm3), Fe (density = 7.86 g/cm3), Mn (density = 7.21 g/cm3)
and Zn (density = 7.14 g/cm3). The density of bioactive glass
- ceramics are higher than their respective bioactive glasses due to densification.

4.3 Elastic Properties Measurements

In general, the increase in ultrasonic wave velocities (longitudinal and shear) and elastic modulus of glasses are related to the increase in connectivity of the glass network [15], [16]. An increase in longitudinal and shear ultrasonic wave velocities and Young’s, shear and bulk modulus of

45S5 bioactive glass due to increase of CuO, Fe2O3, MnO2 and ZnO contents in it, can be explained by the decrease in the inter - atomic spacing which means that the copper, iron, manganese and zinc ions with octahedral coordination are involved in the glass network as modifiers by occupying the interstitial positions which cause the increase in the average number of the network bonds per unit volume. Therefore, it can be suggested that CuO, Fe2O3, MnO2 and ZnO modification leads to an increase in the network connectivity of the studied bioactive glasses. A decrease in Poisson’s ratio of 45S5 bioactive glass with increasing of network modifiers is attributed to increase the
crosslink density (defined as the number of bridging bonds

per cation) of glass network [17].

It is generally accepted that the controlled heat treatment of
glasses above the glass transition temperature and crystallisation temperature leads the possible formation of crystalline phases along with the residual glassy phases [18]. The observed increase in ultrasonic wave velocities and elastic modulus, and decrease in Poisson’s ratio of bioactive glass - ceramics is mainly due to the densification during thermal treatments.

5 CONCLUSIONS

Addition of CuO, Fe2O3, MnO2 and ZnO contents in 45S5 bioactive glass increases its density and elastic modulus: Young’s, shear and bulk modulus while a decreases its Poisson’s ratio. Crystallization of bioactive glasses enhances their density and elastic properties.

References

[1] S.M. Best, A.E. Porter, E.S. Thian and J. Huang, “Bioceramics: Past, present and for the future”, Journal of the European Ceramic Society, vol. 28, pp. 1319 - 1327, 2008. [2] M.N. Rahaman, D.E. Day, B.S. Bal, Q. Fu, S.B. Jung, L.F. Bonewald and A.P. Tomsia, “Bioactive glass in tissue engineering”, Acta Biomaterialia, vol. 7, pp. 2355 - 2373,
2011.
*3+ L.L. Hench and O. Andersson, “An Introduction to Bioceramics”, editors, L.L. Hench and J. Wilson, World Scientific, Singapore, pp. - 41, 1993.
[4] V. Aina, G. Malavasi, A.F. Pla, L. Munaron and C.
Morterra, “Zinc - containing bioactive glasses: Surface reactivity and behaviour towards endothelial cells”, Acta Biomaterialia, vol. 5, pp. 1211 - 1222, 2009.
*5+ C.C. Lin, L.C. Huang and P. Shen, “Na2CaSi2O6 - P2O5 based bioactive glasses. Part 1: Elasticity and structure”, Journal of Non - Crystalline Solids, vol. 351, pp. 3195 - 3203,
2005.
[6] V. Rajendran, A.N. Begum, M.A. Azooz and F.H. ElBatal, “Microstructural dependence on relevant physical - mechanical properties on SiO2 - Na2O - CaO - P2O5 biological glasses”, Biomaterials, vol. 23, pp. 4263 - 4275,
2002.
[7] K.A. Matori, M.H.M. Zaid, H.A.A. Sidek, M.K. Halimah, Z.A. Wahab and M.G.M. Sabri, “Influence of ZnO on the ultrasonic velocity and elastic moduli of soda lime silicate glasses”, International Journal of the Physical Sciences, vol.
5(14), pp. 2212 - 2216, 2010.
*8+ B. Eraiah, M.G. Smitha and R.V. Anavekar, “Elastic properties of lead - phosphate glasses doped with samarium trioxide”, Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids, vol. 71, pp. 153 - 155, 2010.

[9 ] M.H.M. Zaid, K.A. Matori, L.C. Wah, H.A.A. Sidek,

M.K. Halimah, Z.A. Wahab and B.Z. Azmi, “Elastic moduli

IJSER © 2012 http://www.ijser.org

International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 3, Issue 2, February-2012 13

ISSN 2229-5518

prediction and correlation in soda lime silicate glasses

containing ZnO”, International Journal of the Physical

Sciences, vol. 6(6), pp. 1404 - 1410, 2011.

[10] F.H. ElBatal and A. ElKheshen, “Preparation and characterization of some substituted bioglasses and their ceramic derivatives from the system SiO2 - Na2O - CaO - P2O5 and effect of gamma irradiation”, Materials Chemistry and Physics, vol. 110, pp. 352 - 362, 2008.
*11+ P.F. James, “Glass ceramics: new compositions and uses”, Journal of Non - Crystalline Solids, vol. 181, pp. 1 -
15, 1995.
[12] L.L. Hench, R.J. Splinter, T.K. Greenlee and W.C. Allen, “Bonding mechanisms at the interface of ceramic prosthetic materials”, Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, vol. 2 (part 1), pp. 117 - 141, 1971.
*13+ L.L. Hench and H.A. Paschall, “Direct chemical bonding of bioactive glass - ceramic materials and bone”, Journal of Biomedical Materials Research: Symp., vol. 4, pp.
25 - 42, 1973.
[14] V.R. Mastelaro, E.D. Zanotto, N. Lequeux and R. Cortes, “Relationship between short - range order and ease of nucleation in Na2Ca2Si3O9, CaSiO3 and PbSiO3 glasses”, Journal of Non - Crystalline Solids, vol. 262, pp. 191 - 199,
2000.

[15] M.S. Gaafar, F.H. ElBatal, M. ElGazery and S.A. Mansour, “Effect of Doping by Different Transition Metals on the Acoustical Properties of Alkali Borate Glasses”, Acta Physica Polonica A, vol. 115, pp. 671 - 678, 2009.

[16] A.N. Kannappan, S. Thirumaran and R. Palani, “Elastic

and Mechanical Properties of Glass Specimen by Ultrasonic Method”, ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, vol. 4(1), pp. 27 - 31, 2009.

*17+ A. Higazy and B. Bridge. “Elastic constants and structure of the vitreous system Co3O4 - P2O4”, Journal of Non - Crystalline Solids, vol. 72, pp. 81 - 108, 1985.
[18] A.V. Gayathri Devi, V. Rajendran and N. Rajendran, “Ultrasonic characterisation of calcium phosphate glasses and glass - ceramics with addition of TiO2”, International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology vol. 2(6), pp. 2483-2490, 2010.

————————————————

Ankesh Kumar Srivastava, Ram Pyare and S. P. Singh

Department of Ceramic Engineering, Institute of Technology
Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi - 221005: INDIA

Corresponding Author

Ankesh Kumar Srivastava
E - mail: ankesh.000@gmail.com

IJSER © 2012 http://www.ijser.org