International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 5, Issue 2, February-2014 1097

ISSN 2229-5518

Effects of Face Book on Political Behavior of Students of University of Gujrat

Saima Zareen1 , ,Dr Arshad Ali 2,Muhammad Ali Junjua3

Department of Media and Communication University of Nicosia ,Cyprus

Department of Communication Studies and Media Center, University of Gujrat,, Pakistan

Abstract

The study was conducted at the university of Gujrat to examine the role of social media specially face book is creating awareness among students about political system of Pakistan and possible change in political behavior of students after exposure to political content on face book. Survey research method was adopted in this research. A pilot study was conducted before choosing sample. During pilot study survey method was used to find out that student of which departments of

University use face book the most. It was found that students of CS/IT and MCM department use face book. Through Survey Research, data was collected from 120 respondents, among which 67 were male while remaining 53 were female. A clear majority of 65% of the respondents belong to age
group from 22-24 years.30%,19-21.56.7% of respondents belong to Urban area, 30% from Sub Urban area while only 13.3% belong to Rural area.
Key Words:Face book,political system,Social media

Introduction

Media has a powerful and significant role in human life. It is the source of information, entertainment and education.
Role of media in the life of people and in the society development can’t be overlooked. Media is considered as the mirror of society. It has now become an important pillar of society as well as state.
Media is considered as the most influential tool of communication. Its duty is to promote the right thing on right time. A new kind of media, social media, has become an important phenomenon around
the globe. It has got immense importance after its effective role in 2008 Presidential elections of U.S
and its role in Arab Upspring. This study will examine the role of social media specially face book in creating awareness among students about political system of Pakistan and possible change in political behavior of students after exposure to political content on face book. Social network sites started emerging in 1990s and now become an important online tool. Social networks through social networking sites provides a platform to its users to communicate with each other and share personal information, beliefs thoughts, experiences, knowledge ,interest and affiliations. It also allows the users to form their online communities. Social networking sites allow users to present themselves in the form of text, videos and multimedia content. Social media includes cell phone& worldwide web bases technologies which give birth to interactive online communities. Andreas Kaplan and Michael Haenlich (2010) defines social media as a group of Internet based application that build on ideological
& technological foundations of Web 2.0 & that allows creation & exchange of user generated content.

1.1 Objectives of the research:

The objectives of this thesis are:
• To calculate relationship between online political participation and face book usage.
• To find out the relationship between face book usage and traditional political participation.

IJSER © 2014 http://www.ijser.org

International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 5, Issue 2, February-2014 1098

ISSN 2229-5518

• To investigate the effects of online political participation on social media and traditional political participation.
• To evaluate the change in attitude of students after exposure to political content on face book
• To find out the level of change in behavior of students after exposed to political content on face book

1.2 Significance of the study:

Present era is the age of internet and New Media. This new media has opened new platforms and communication channels for its users around the globe.
The use of Internet as a private advertisement campaign started in nineties but the advent of social media including face book, YouTube, twitter, blogs and discussion boards has demonstrated the true strength of this medium.
. Today it is no more difficult for a common person to make his views on any of the current happening wit in the country as well as around the globe. People use to discuss ranging from economic crisis in country to international political paradigm shifts without any censor and fear. It can be said easily that Social media has now become a new hub and platform for communication. Social media has become a new phenomenon in the political spectrum of the world. Only a decade ago television & internet were considered new media but today we are living in the age of face book, twitters & blogs; a new social media
Social media has got immense importance after its role in political campaign of U.S presidential elections 2008.Many of the political scholars termed these elections as “face book election”, “twitter election” and “New media elections”. Face book and YouTube were used as a tool to deliver messages and share the timings and venues of meetings and public addressees by the presidential candidates. According to many political scholars of U.S.A the biggest factor which boosted up the campaign of Barack Hussain Obama and provides him platform to communicate with his supporters and voters was the use of social media specially face book.
Face book also played a pivotal role in Tunisian and Egypt revolution. Protestors couldn’t get proper coverage from the national TV so they used the platform of social media like face book and twitter to not only communicate and deliver message to mainstream international media but also to gather protestors and inform them about the next place of protest.
Pakistan has a democratic parliamentary federal system of government. Although it has a democratic system of choosing public representatives but three military coups of 1958–1971, 1977–1988 and
1999–2008 haven’t strengthened the democratic system of Pakistan
Social Bakers.com is a credible research company in terms of social media research.According to which Pakistan has 6943720 active users and astonishingly 50% of the users are between the ages of
25-34.According to latest statistics of socialbakers.com among 6943720 users, 69% male and 31%
females use internet.
Youth use face book for many different purposes. A new trend on face book is observed by the researchers that many of the face book users share political content on face book like pictures, videos and advertisements of a particular political party leader or Political party. According to media report now the mainstream Political parties of Pakistan have formed their social media teams whose primary
duty is the image building of its political party as well as the leaders of the parties. These social media

IJSER © 2014 http://www.ijser.org

International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 5, Issue 2, February-2014 1099

ISSN 2229-5518

activist try to circulate the activities and manifesto of its affiliated party. They also counter the propaganda led by opponent political party’s social media team. .In this research researcher will try to examine and find out that can face book be used as a powerful tool in political scenario of Pakistan.

1.3Research Question:

Whether and to what extent exposure to political content on face book affects, Political Behavior of
Students of University of Gujrat?

1.4 Hypothesis:

• More exposure to political content on face book, more is the online political participation by students.
• Intensity of exposure to political content on face book usage is directly related to traditional political participation.
• Students would be more vigilant to cast a vote in coming elections.
• Students would be more vocal to discuss political conditions of the country with parents and friends.

1.5 Face book:

Face book is a social networking website which was launched in 2004. Initially membership was only available for the students of Harvard College & within one month, more than half of the degree students at Harvard got themselves registered on Face book .Like other social media website face book provide its users a formatted page in which users use to enter his or her personal information like name ,age, gender, education ,place of birth, religious and political views, marital status, likings and disliking and his personal or family pictures etc. .Face book also provide services like “private messaging” system as well as public messaging system in the form of “Wall”.

1.6Face book User in Pakistan:

Pakistan has a huge chunk of population using Face book. Pakistan has 6898720 face book users which make Pakistan 29 in the ranking of Face book statistics (socialbaker.com).According to social badker.com, 3.89 of total population of Pakistan use face book. Astonishingly the largest age group is currently 18-24 with total 073368113 users followed by the users in the age 25-34.out of 3.89 % of face book users 69% are male & 31% female users in Pakistan. source (www.socialbakers.com/face book. statistics/ Pakistan).According to Pakistan Telecommunication Authority, more than 20 million Pakistanis are online, which means that the number using Face book is only 32.86% of the total online population.

1.7Students of Mass communication and CS/IT:

A Pilot study was conducted before choosing the sample from the University of Gujrat.It was found after the pilot study that students of Mass communication and CS/IT use face book the most among other departments. They are the active users of face book.

1.8 Literature Review:

(Basely & Burgess 2002; Dyck & Zingales 2002; Hamilton 2003). Media may influence the public not only by choosing the slant of a particular story but also choosing what to report (George & Waldfogel 2006).

IJSER © 2014 http://www.ijser.org

International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 5, Issue 2, February-2014 1100

ISSN 2229-5518

Alen Gerber, Dean Karlan & Daniel Bergan(2007) argued that Media bias may alter behavior & opinions. They added that knowledge of news events & little exposure to daily newspaper influence voting behavior as well as public opinion.
Negroponte (1995) and Rash (1997) were of the opinion that internet has potential of renewal of democracy.
Gibson and Ward (2000) argue that five functions are important for website if it is to be used for political purpose it includes flow of info, multimedia and interactivity, interactivity for content sharing use of hyperlinks, effective feedback
(Marta, 2010) says Face book is modern and effective in statement for E-campaigning
(Mossberger et al, 2008; Shah et al, 2005; Shah, Mc Lead & Lee 2009).
(Lenhart, Maddon Macgill & Smith, 2007). New media which include blogs forums & social networking sites have become a platform for political expression & discussion
Wojcieszak & Mutz (2009) found 53% of youth observe political discussion in online chat rooms &
forums as compared to sites related to their habits & fan sites.
Krueger(2002); Mossberger et al (2008) found that youth is a heavy consumer & user of new media. (Lenhart et al, 2007) Pew research Institute & American life project examined that 64% of youth on internet involves in online content formation & 28% have developed personal blogs.
Erikson, (1968); Smith, (1999); Jennings & Niemi, (1981) suggested that youth is time of significant political identity development & this development has lasting effects.
(Earl & Schuss man 2003). An easy approach for any individual to share it on SNS is viewed as step toward more democratic society. Benkler (2006), Jenkins (2007) & Salter (2005),mention that social networking sites provide a logical sphere for voice cultivation & political citizenship formation:
Conway (1985) says that political participation is indicated through electoral activities, voting and to work for political parties.
Verba, Schlozman & Brudy (1995) say that working for the betterment of community and attending political protests refers to political participation
Zukin et al (2006) argues political participation involves public voice and process through which common public give views on public issues. It may include contacting official, boycotting & protestin.
Pasek, More & Romer (2009) found that intensity of usage of social networking sites is positively associated with offline political participation.
Those who consume social networks are not likely to vote, sign a petition or boycott (Baumgartner & Morris 2010).
Tersi (2010) found that information relayed through face book increase political knowledge.
Towner & Dilio (2011) found more exposed to face book page effect political knowledge of candidate.

IJSER © 2014 http://www.ijser.org

International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 5, Issue 2, February-2014 1101

ISSN 2229-5518

Althaus and Tewkbury (2000) argues that people now prefer online newspaper when gathering political information rather that TV & hardcopy newspaper.
Smith (2009) mentions that more than 50 yeasr of youth who have right to vote use internet during election.
Skoric and kwon (2011) found that intensity of face book usage was marginally related to political Participation they found that those who are part of any face book political group are found interested in other forms online participation like reading political blogs.
Ashay Payne (2009) found face book did have impact on 2008 presidential elections. It was not a direct impact rather indirect in the form of awareness and info related to election use of SNS is a cheap, fast way to interact with voters with direct message.
Visser & Stolle, (2012) concluded that face book has mobilization potential they say “face book political activism is positively associated with online and offline participation”. They add that “mobilization power of face book result in a little increase in other types of political participations.”
Face book mobilization is observed in political interested groups of face book rather than less interested individuals.
Visser and Stolle, (2011) also found posting and reading political content on face book wall of other peoples or on open wall inspires pol. activities on other places
Popkin,Jermy D (1995): Revolutionary crises coincide with sudden changes in the media system of society in which they occur media has greater influence on the way events disclosed in revolutionary crises situation. Popkin further said, “The press doesn’t bring the revolution, but it is the one & the some with revolution process.
Popkin Jermy D (1995) says French revolution is the very first example of journalistic rhetoric. He adds revolution in media affects revolution in society. Nature of Revolutions changes with the advent in media technologies & techniques.
Ghannam & Harsh say that social media especially face book & twitter become powerful tool to bring political change.
Joudeh found that face book & twitter facilitated people of Middle East to share political videos organize protest & relay their massage to masses.
Tapscott says that without face book & Twitter revolution couldn’t happen so fast. According to Tapscott the page which was responsible of relaying information for protestors has got 100,000 friends in a week & reached to half a million in no time.
Out of 80 million population of Egypt more than 21 years had internet and more than 4.5 million were face book users (Internet World Stats, 2011).
( Eltantawy, Wriest, 2011). It was April, 2008 when first cyber-activism attempt was made through face book page for textile workers to place a strike. This expedience leads to 2011 protest that resulted in revolution.
Fisher (2011) concluded that when an effort was made by Government of Tunisia to ban reporting form Tahrir Square, social media transformed protester in to citizen journalist.

IJSER © 2014 http://www.ijser.org

International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 5, Issue 2, February-2014 1102

ISSN 2229-5518

Mohenad Ahmed(2011) found that public still uses traditional media as source of political information, they learn more from online political News, forums and social networking sites like face book and twitter, additionally he says that online political news plays a significant role in increasing political knowledge, interest and participation in political activity.
According to Marzoub& Moez(2012) the timely, speed, target specific and purpose based “collective cyber consciousness” were the qualities that made Tunisian revolution successful. He adds that positive perception was noted among Tunisian face book users towards usefulness of face book.
Marzoub& Moez(2012) say revolution in Tunisia set off waves of continuous protest in many neighboring countries like Egypt, Morocco, Syria, Iran, Yemen and Jordan.
Moez, Marzoub found that role of face book in revolutions like in Tunisia, Egypt and other countries proved face book as revolutionary weapon of dignity and freedom.
Tamara A Small in Nov 2008 wrote in magazine “Policy option” under the topic”. “The face book effect? Online campaigning in 2008 Canadian & U.S election. He says that the role of face book on electoral politics remain to be examined however role of internet has gained importance in both U.S and Canada.
Vitak, Zube, Smock, Ellison & Lampe; (2010) found that face book usage is positively related to online political participation while interestingly face book usage is not related to offline/traditional political participation.
Miller (2008) wrote in New York Times blog that Obama had effective campaign on face book than his opponent. Obama got lam likes on face book during 2008.
A study by Harvard school of politics in 2011 revealed that 27% of youth is of the opinion that face book and other social media websites have stronger effect that other type of advocacy
Shirky (2008) shows the strength of new age media & mobilize political support. He shows that how “Web 2.0” technology has gathered people & forces them to perform effectively as compares to traditional media.
Williams & Gulati (2008) found that “Face book played a role in early 2008 nomination contest”

Theoretical Framework

1.9 Uses and Gratification Theory:

Uses and gratification is a popular approach to examine that why people seek out specific media outlet and its content for personal gratification purpose. Theory revolves around the phenomenon in which a media consumer searches for some specific media that not only meet a given need but also enhance its social interaction, diversion and knowledge. According to Blumler & Kat’z Uses and Gratification theory, it is the user who has options to select a specific media outlet and its content for his gratification

1.10 Media System Dependency Theory:

The dependency theory was derived from Uses and Gratification theory. Media dependency refers to tendency of media consumer to rely and approach a particular communication media for his/her gratification.

2.1 Cultivation Theory:

IJSER © 2014 http://www.ijser.org

International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 5, Issue 2, February-2014 1103

ISSN 2229-5518

Cultivation theory was put forward by George Gerbner and Larry Gross who were professors in
University of Pennsylvania.
Cultivation theory revolves around the long term effects of Television.

2.2 Methodology:

Survey research method was adopted in this research. Out of two major types of surveys : descriptive and analytical, analytical research procedure is adopted in this study in order to explore the relationship between face book user’s exposure to political content on face book and its effect on political behavior of students of University of Gujrat.

2.3 Population

In the study universe is students, University of Gujrat.

2.4 Sampling:

2.5 Pilot Study:

A pilot study was conducted before choosing sample. During pilot study survey method was used to find out that student of which departments of University of Gujrat use face book the most .It was found that students of CS/IT and MCM department use face book the most.

2.6 Stratified Sampling:

Stratified sampling is an approach used to adequate representation of Subsamples. In present study, target sample of 120 was stratified on the basis of maximum face book usage. After pilot study it was found that students of CS-IT and Mass Communication use face book the most. So an equal number of respondent, 60, 60 were taken as sample from CS-IT and Mass Communication.

2.7 Unit of Analysis:

In this study unit of analysis is. One questionnaire for one respondent.

2.8Variables

2.9 Dependent and Independent Variables

2.10 Independent Variables:

• Exposure to political content on Face book
• Literal participation in politics related activities.

3.1 Dependent Variables:

Political Behavior of UOG students.

3.2 Framing the Questioner.

Each question was directly related to questionnaire’s objectives.
• How much time users spend with Face book?
• What kind of content is mostly shared on Face book by users?
• What kind of attitude change come after exposure to political content on Face book?
• How political perception of users change after exposing to political content on Face book?
• What kind of behavior change is observed in the students after exposure to political content

IJSER © 2014 http://www.ijser.org

International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 5, Issue 2, February-2014 1104

ISSN 2229-5518

on Face book..

3.3 Data Presentation:

Data is presented in Univariate frequency in shape of graphics and tables along with interpretation to
make it clear and understandable. Collected data was entered and interpreted by SPSS. The tables below show frequency and percentage of response categories.
Table 1: Frequency of usage of face book.

Frequency

Percent

Valid Daily

On alternate days Once in a week Once in a month

Total

59

49.2

Valid Daily

On alternate days Once in a week Once in a month

Total

26

21.7

Valid Daily

On alternate days Once in a week Once in a month

Total

27

22.5

Valid Daily

On alternate days Once in a week Once in a month

Total

8

6.7

Valid Daily

On alternate days Once in a week Once in a month

Total

120

100.0

Figure 1: Presentation of frequency of Usage of facebook

150

100

50

0

Daily On alternate days

Once in a week Once in a month Total

Frequency

Percent

Table 2: Time spent on face book.

Frequency

Percent

Valid Less than 5 hours More than 5 hours Less than 20 hours More than 20 hours

Total

43

35.8

Valid Less than 5 hours More than 5 hours Less than 20 hours More than 20 hours

Total

41

34.2

Valid Less than 5 hours More than 5 hours Less than 20 hours More than 20 hours

Total

25

20.8

Valid Less than 5 hours More than 5 hours Less than 20 hours More than 20 hours

Total

11

9.2

Valid Less than 5 hours More than 5 hours Less than 20 hours More than 20 hours

Total

120

100.0

IJSER © 2014 http://www.ijser.org

International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 5, Issue 2, February-2014 1105

ISSN 2229-5518

Figure 2: Presentation of time spent on facebook.

140

120

100

80

60

40

20

0

Less

More

Less

More

Total

Frequency

Percent

than 5

than 5

than 20 than 20

hours

hours

hours

hours

.
Table 3: Purpose of using face book.

Frequency

Percent

Valid Information

Entertainment

Sharing personal content Business Purpose Networking

Total

33

27.5

Valid Information

Entertainment

Sharing personal content Business Purpose Networking

Total

40

33.3

Valid Information

Entertainment

Sharing personal content Business Purpose Networking

Total

33

27.5

Valid Information

Entertainment

Sharing personal content Business Purpose Networking

Total

2

1.7

Valid Information

Entertainment

Sharing personal content Business Purpose Networking

Total

12

10.0

Valid Information

Entertainment

Sharing personal content Business Purpose Networking

Total

120

100.0

Figure 3: Presentation of purpose of using facebook.

140

120

100

80

60

40

20

0

Frequency

Percent

IJSER © 2014 http://www.ijser.org

International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 5, Issue 2, February-2014 1106

ISSN 2229-5518

Table 4: Kind of Content shared on face book.

Frequency

Percent

Valid Personal Informative Political Funny Literature All of these

Total

13

10.8

Valid Personal Informative Political Funny Literature All of these

Total

27

22.5

Valid Personal Informative Political Funny Literature All of these

Total

20

16.7

Valid Personal Informative Political Funny Literature All of these

Total

12

10.0

Valid Personal Informative Political Funny Literature All of these

Total

23

19.2

Valid Personal Informative Political Funny Literature All of these

Total

25

20.8

Valid Personal Informative Political Funny Literature All of these

Total

120

100.0

Figure 4: Presentation of kind of Content shared on facebook

140

120

100

80

60

40

20

0

Frequency

Percent

Table 5: Do you share political content on face book?

Frequency

Percent

Valid Yes

To some extent

No

Total

43

35.8

Valid Yes

To some extent

No

Total

44

36.7

Valid Yes

To some extent

No

Total

33

27.5

Valid Yes

To some extent

No

Total

120

100.0

IJSER © 2014 http://www.ijser.org

International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 5, Issue 2, February-2014 1107

ISSN 2229-5518

Figure 5: Do you share political content on facebook.

140

120

100

80

60

40

20

0

Yes To some extent

No Total

Frequency

Percent

T able 6: R easons of sharing politic al conte nt on f ace book.

Figure 6: Presentation of reasons of sharing political content on facebook.

140

120

100

80

60

40

20

0

For political

To share

To inform

To create

Total

Frequency

Percent

updates

your political other people

political

ideas

about personal political affiliation

awareness among other students

IJSER © 2014 http://www.ijser.org

International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 5, Issue 2, February-2014 1108

ISSN 2229-5518

Table 7: How do you keep political information which you get from face book?

Frequency

Percent

Valid Personal

Share it with online community

Tag your information

Share it with offline community

Total

26

21.7

Valid Personal

Share it with online community

Tag your information

Share it with offline community

Total

67

55.8

Valid Personal

Share it with online community

Tag your information

Share it with offline community

Total

18

15.0

Valid Personal

Share it with online community

Tag your information

Share it with offline community

Total

9

7.5

Valid Personal

Share it with online community

Tag your information

Share it with offline community

Total

120

100.0

Figure 7: Presentation of the way that how people keep political information got from

facebook.

150

100

50

0

Personal Share it with online

community

Tag your information

Share it with offline community

Total

Frequency

Percent

Table8: Kind of attitude change after exposure to political content on facbook.

Frequency

Percent

Valid Joining political forums

Watching political talk shows on TV Following political news on newspaper Following online newspaper for political news

Total

15

12.5

Valid Joining political forums

Watching political talk shows on TV Following political news on newspaper Following online newspaper for political news

Total

71

59.2

Valid Joining political forums

Watching political talk shows on TV Following political news on newspaper Following online newspaper for political news

Total

17

14.2

Valid Joining political forums

Watching political talk shows on TV Following political news on newspaper Following online newspaper for political news

Total

17

14.2

Valid Joining political forums

Watching political talk shows on TV Following political news on newspaper Following online newspaper for political news

Total

120

100.0

IJSER © 2014 http://www.ijser.org

International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 5, Issue 2, February-2014 1109

ISSN 2229-5518

Figure 8: Presentation of kind of attitude change after exposure to political content on

facbook

140

120

100

80

60

40

20

0

Joining political forums

Watching political talk shows on TV

Following political news on newspaper

Following online newspaper for political news

Total

Frequency

Percent

Table 9: Do you share your political information with your family?

Frequency

Percent

Valid Yes

To some extent

No

Total

44

36.7

Valid Yes

To some extent

No

Total

57

47.5

Valid Yes

To some extent

No

Total

19

15.8

Valid Yes

To some extent

No

Total

120

100.0

Figur 9: Do you share your political information with your family?

150

100

50

Frequency

Percent

0

Yes To some extent No Total

IJSER © 2014 http://www.ijser.org

International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 5, Issue 2, February-2014 1110

ISSN 2229-5518

Table 10: Do you follow any political party’s event on face book?

Frequency

Percent

Valid Yes

No

Total

42

35.0

Valid Yes

No

Total

78

65.0

Valid Yes

No

Total

120

100.0

Figure10: Do you follow any political party’s event on facebook?

140

120

100

80

60

40

20

0

4235

120

100

78

65

Yes No Total

.Table11: Subscriptions to any political parties in following ways.

Frequency

Percent

Valid Sms service

E-mail notification Official news letter None

Total

44

36.7

Valid Sms service

E-mail notification Official news letter None

Total

28

23.3

Valid Sms service

E-mail notification Official news letter None

Total

9

7.5

Valid Sms service

E-mail notification Official news letter None

Total

39

32.5

Valid Sms service

E-mail notification Official news letter None

Total

120

100.0

IJSER © 2014 http://www.ijser.org

International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 5, Issue 2, February-2014 1111

ISSN 2229-5518

Figure11: Presentation of Subscriptions of political party’s campaign based services.

140

120

100

80

60

40

20

0

Frequency

Percent

Table 12: Do you attend any political party’s…….?

Frequency

Percent

Valid Meeting Rally Procession Strike

Fund raising

None

Total

13

10.8

Valid Meeting Rally Procession Strike

Fund raising

None

Total

27

22.5

Valid Meeting Rally Procession Strike

Fund raising

None

Total

7

5.8

Valid Meeting Rally Procession Strike

Fund raising

None

Total

13

10.8

Valid Meeting Rally Procession Strike

Fund raising

None

Total

15

12.5

Valid Meeting Rally Procession Strike

Fund raising

None

Total

45

37.5

Valid Meeting Rally Procession Strike

Fund raising

None

Total

120

100.0

IJSER © 2014 http://www.ijser.org

International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 5, Issue 2, February-2014 1112

ISSN 2229-5518

Figure 12: Presentation of change in behavior of students exposed to political content on

facebook.

140

120

100

80

60

40

20

0

Table 13: Willingness to vote in next election?

Frequency

Percent

Valid Yes

No

not decided yet

Total

80

66.7

Valid Yes

No

not decided yet

Total

22

18.3

Valid Yes

No

not decided yet

Total

18

15.0

Valid Yes

No

not decided yet

Total

120

100.0

Figure 13: Presentation of willingness to vote in next election.

150

100

50

0

Yes No not decided yet

Total

IJSER © 2014 http://www.ijser.org

International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 5, Issue 2, February-2014 1113

ISSN 2229-5518

Table 14: Reasons of not casting vote:

Frequency

Percent

Valid Lack of awareness

Political candidates are corrupt

Because of the thought that change can't be brought through elections

Voting is just wastage of time

Political system is corrupt

Total

29

24.2

Valid Lack of awareness

Political candidates are corrupt

Because of the thought that change can't be brought through elections

Voting is just wastage of time

Political system is corrupt

Total

37

30.8

Valid Lack of awareness

Political candidates are corrupt

Because of the thought that change can't be brought through elections

Voting is just wastage of time

Political system is corrupt

Total

24

20.0

Valid Lack of awareness

Political candidates are corrupt

Because of the thought that change can't be brought through elections

Voting is just wastage of time

Political system is corrupt

Total

8

6.7

Valid Lack of awareness

Political candidates are corrupt

Because of the thought that change can't be brought through elections

Voting is just wastage of time

Political system is corrupt

Total

22

18.3

Valid Lack of awareness

Political candidates are corrupt

Because of the thought that change can't be brought through elections

Voting is just wastage of time

Political system is corrupt

Total

120

100.0

Figure14: Presentation of reasons of not casting vote.

140

120

100

80

60

40

20

0

Lack of awareness

Political candidates are corrupt

Because of the thought that change can't be brought

through

elections

Voting is just wastage of time

Political system is corrupt

Total

IJSER © 2014 http://www.ijser.org

International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 5, Issue 2, February-2014 1114

ISSN 2229-5518

Table15: Effect of face book on traditional political affiliation.

Frequency

Percent

Valid Yes off course

to some extent

Not at all

Total

33

27.5

Valid Yes off course

to some extent

Not at all

Total

57

47.5

Valid Yes off course

to some extent

Not at all

Total

30

25.0

Valid Yes off course

to some extent

Not at all

Total

120

100.0

Figure15: Presentation of effect of facebook on traditional political affiliation.

140

120

100

80

60

40

20

0

Yes off course

to some extent

Not at all Total

Frequency

Percent

Table 16: Political content sharing on face book can bring positive and concrete change in
Pakistani Political System?

Frequency

Percent

Valid Yes

To some extent

No

Total

57

47.5

Valid Yes

To some extent

No

Total

52

43.3

Valid Yes

To some extent

No

Total

11

9.2

Valid Yes

To some extent

No

Total

120

100.0

IJSER © 2014 http://www.ijser.org

International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 5, Issue 2, February-2014 1115

ISSN 2229-5518

Figure 16: Political content sharing on facebook can bring positive and concrete change in

Pakistani Political System

140

120

100

80

60

40

20

0

Yes To some extent

No Total

Table5. 17:Department of respondents and sharing of Political Content.

Do you share political content on facebook

Yes

To some

extent No

Total

Department of respondents

MCM 21 22 17 60

CS-IT 22 22 16 60

Total 43 44 33 120

Figure5.17: Representation of department of respondents and sharing of Political Content.
Table5.18:Department of respondents and change in attitude after exposure to political content on face book

Department of r

espondents * What kind of attitude change do you feel after exposure to political content on facbook Crosstabulation

espondents * What kind of attitude change do you feel after exposure to political content on facbook Crosstabulation

What kind of attitude change do you feel after exposure to political content on facbook

Total

Joining political forums

Watching political talk shows on TV

Following political news on newspaper

Following online newspaper for political news

Total

IJSER © 2014 http://www.ijser.org

International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 5, Issue 2, February-2014 1116

ISSN 2229-5518

Department of respondents

MCM

6

32

10

12

60

Department of respondents

CS-IT

9

39

7

5

60

Total

15

71

17

17

120

Figure 5.18:Representation of Departments of respondents and change in attitude after exposure to political content on face book
Table 5.19:Departments of respondents and following of Online Political Party ‘s events on facebook.

Do you follow any political party’s event on facebook

Total

Yes

No

Total

Department of respondents

MCM CS-IT

21

29

50

Department of respondents

MCM CS-IT

20

50

70

Total

MCM CS-IT

41

79

120

Departments of respondents *Do you follow any Political party’s events on face book -tabulation

IJSER © 2014 http://www.ijser.org

International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 5, Issue 2, February-2014 1117

ISSN 2229-5518

Figure 5.19:Representation of department of respondents and following of Online Political party’s event on face book.

Table 5.20:Departments of respondent and their offline political participation.

Department of respondents * Do you attend any political party’s?

Do you attend any political party’s?

Total

Meeting

Rally

Procession

Strike

Fund raising

None

Total

Department of respondents

MCM

9

13

2

4

5

27

60

Department of respondents

CS-IT

4

14

5

9

10

18

60

Total

13

27

7

13

15

45

120

Figure 5.20:Representation of Departments of respondents and their offline political participation.

Table 5.21:Departments respondents and their perception regarding of political content on face book.

IJSER © 2014 http://www.ijser.org

International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 5, Issue 2, February-2014 1118

ISSN 2229-5518

Department of respondents * Do you think sharing political content on facebook Cross- tabulation

Do you think sharing political content on facebook

Total

Should be encouraged

Should be discouraged because it may misguide

It doesn't matter

Total

Department of respondents

MCM

32

9

19

60

Department of respondents

CS-IT

31

8

21

60

Total

63

17

40

120

Figure 5.21:representation departments of respondent and their perception regarding sharing of political content on face book.
Table 5.22:Department of respondents and perception about productivity of face book in changing political system in Pakistan.

IJSER © 2014 http://www.ijser.org

International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 5, Issue 2, February-2014 1119

ISSN 2229-5518

Department of respondents * Do you think that political content sharing on facebook can bring positive and concrete change in Pakistani Political System? Crosstabulation

Do you think that political content sharing on facebook can bring positive and concrete change in Pakistani Political System?

Total

Yes

To some extent

No

Total

Department of respondents

MCM

32

21

7

60

Department of respondents

CS-IT

25

31

4

60

Total

57

52

11

120

Figure 5.22: Representation of Department of respondents and their perception about productivity of face book in changing political system in Pakistan.

Discussion on Results

Study reveals that sharing political content on face book isn’t the priority of many of the students. However 16% students share political content on face book. Majority of student share either personal information, literary and funny content on face book. 16% of students who share political content hold
the view that they do this to share their own political ideas. 13% believe that their consent is to inform

IJSER © 2014 http://www.ijser.org

International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 5, Issue 2, February-2014 1120

ISSN 2229-5518

other people about their political affiliations. Sharing political information got from face book with online community is the practice of almost 67%of students of University of Gujrat. They share it with their online friends and groups while only 26% keep that information personal.
Study reveals a considerable change in the attitude of students who are exposed to political content on face book. Wide majority of 71% students started watching political talk shows on television. Nowadays political talk shows have gained much popularity in political arena of the country. A nearly every current issue and event of the day is discussed on talk shows on that night in two time slots
8:00pm to 9:00pm & 10:00pm to 11:00pm.
Proportion of joining political forums on internet after exposure to political content is very low up to
15% only. The proportion of Computer Science students is more in terms of joining political forums on internet. This is because students of Computer Science and Information Technology have more exposure to internet because of its relevancy with their field.
Study shows that most of the students, almost 56% are exposed to political content on face book or who share such type of content, don’t frequently discuss it with their family members. They either discuss on important updates or if something happened unusual. Otherwise their communication remains strictly associated with their online community.
First hypothesis of the study was, “more the exposure to political content on face book more is the online political participation”. It has been empirically rejected. Students who are not heavy contributors and consumers of political content face book are not active regarding online political participation. Students who occasionally share political content on face book are 18% which are somehow vibrant in terms of online political participation. While clear majority of 78% don’t participate in any online political activity. Results suggest that contributors of political content on face book don’t have interest in any online political event or activity. They believe that this is a useless activity.
Various internet as well as telecom network based services are provided by the political parties for the people, free official newsletters, emails, and social media updates etc. Our study reveals that 44% of students, who share political content on face book, have subscribed to sms service of particular party, for updates. Sms service has become a new phenomenon in political campaign in Pakistan. Through promotional sms political parties let the voters and supporters know about the activities of political leaders, gatherings of political candidates and party’s stance on different issues on National and International level.
A vast majority of 57% believe that face book has affected their traditional political affiliation up to some extent. This is the statement of the students who use face book on daily basis. A percentage of
14 strongly agreed that face book has affected their traditional political affiliation. It shows that
majority of our respondents are of the view that face book has strength to mould people’s perception in some direction. No matter students share political content on face book or not, they consider face book as a factor to influence one’s action.
Second hypothesis was, “intensity of face book usage is directly related to offline political participation”. Hypothesis is empirically approved, as almost 55% of the students who are exposed to political content on face book are involved in offline political activities. 25% of them participate in rallies, 23% of the students don’t participate in any form of traditional political campaign. It shows
that exposure to face book’s political content is directly related to offline political activities.

IJSER © 2014 http://www.ijser.org

International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 5, Issue 2, February-2014 1121

ISSN 2229-5518

57%of the students among the sample are of the opinion that sharing political content on face book can bring positive and concrete change in Pakistan. However 52% partially agree with this statement while only 11% believe that such activity can’t bring change. It indicates that most of the students have clear perception and belief that face book can act as a catalyst to bring change in political scenario of Pakistan.
52.5% of respondents believe that sharing of political content on face book should be encouraged while 33% believe that political content on face book don’t make any difference. 47.5%of students don’t have any friend or family member who belongs to any political party.
Interestingly 66.7% students are willing to vote in next elections and to become a part of electoral system of Pakistan and clear cut majority of 78.3 % believe that they would cast vote with their own personal decision instead of traditional voting pattern or family motivated polling.
Lack of awareness and corrupt background of the political leaders are the two reasons because of which a total of 55% of students believe that people don’t cast vote. Only 6.7% believe that voting is just wastage of time. Confidence of students on political candidates and political system is very low. They believe that lack of education and awareness is one of the main reasons because of which voting turnout in elections are very low.
Third hypothesis of the study was, “exposure to political content on face book shows the difference between male and female students”. This hypothesis is empirically proven, as the study finds that 67% of male respondents showed change in their attitude after exposure to political content face book, 33% of them started watching political talk shows on TV while 12% & 11% of male students started following online newspapers as well as printed newspaper for political content, respectively. In contrast to that 53% of female respondents found change in their attitude after exposure to political content on face book. Astonishingly 38% of them started watching political talk shows followed by
6% who started reading political news on face book.Study reveals that students who are moderate contributors and consumers of political content on face book are more vibrant in terms of offline political participation.
Male students are more vibrant in terms of both online and offline political participation as compared to female students of CS-IT & MCM department. A slight difference of opinion is observed in this study about the perception of students of both departments regarding productivity of political content on face book. 57% of CS-IT students believe that sharing political content on face book can bring positive and concrete change in Pakistan, followed by 56% of MCM students.
14% of CS-IT students are not willing to cast vote in next elections because of corruption of political candidates and corrupt political system. 44% of MCM students are willing to vote in next elections while only 8% say that they won’t cast vote in next elections. However majority of MCM students believe that political candidates are undoubtedly corrupt.Students of Urban area use face book more than students from sub Urban and Rural areas. Moreover 56% students believe that face book has affected their traditional political affiliation.
Another phenomenon was hypothesized as “Students would be more vigilant to cast vote in coming elections”. This hypothesis is empirically proven. 66.7% students showed their willingness to vote in next general elections. They consider this act as significant step to change the political scene of Pakistan. Non availability of National ID card was one of the main reasons of not casting vote in last general elections. This also shows their improved awareness level regarding political condition of
Pakistan. It was also hypothesized that“Students would be more vocal to discuss political conditions

IJSER © 2014 http://www.ijser.org

International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 5, Issue 2, February-2014 1122

ISSN 2229-5518

of the country with parents and friends”. It is empirically proven. 84.3% students share political condition and political ideas with their families. This shows their concerns about the political situation of Pakistan.It are found that students of CS/IT are more vibrant in terms of sharing political content on face book. Comparative to Mass Comm. students, more than 50% students of CS/IT share political content on face book. This shows their interest in Pakistani politics. However students of both departments have equal proportion of online political participation, 22% each.
In case of offline political participation in political events and activities, students of CS/IT are more vibrant and interested. Almost 47% students of CS/IT participate in different offline political activities ranging from rallies to fund raising. The role of social media in bringing political awareness among students of different academic programs.

Reference.

1.Baumgartner, J.C and Morris, J. S .(2010) MyFace Tube Politics. Social Networking Web sites and political engagement of young adults. Social Science Computer Review 28(1): 24-44.

2.Budak,A. (2010) Face book, Twitter and Barack Obama: New media and 2008 Presidential elections. Faculty of Graduate school of Arts and Sciences, Georgetown University.
3.Burki, Javed.S. (2011, January25).Tunisia’s Ripple Effects. Dawn. (n.d)
4.Can change really take place in presence of Hosni Mubarak? [Editorial]. (2011, February
1).Washington Post.
5.Chomsky, N. (2011, February2) .Democracy now. ( Retrieved 17 September, 2012)
6. (From democracynow.org)
7.Cohen. & Kahne, J. (2009). New media and youth political Action. MacArthur research network.
8.Dalacoura, k. (2012). The 2011 upspring in the Arab Middle East: Political change and geopolitical implications. The Royal Institute of International Affairs.
9.Denton,J.(August 16, 2009).The 2008 Presidential Campaign: A Communication Perspective
(Communication, Media, and Politics). (Retrieved 23 September, 2012)
10.Dionne, E.J. (2011, February 7). Turmoil of Egypt as a lesson in humility. Washington Post.

11.Emruli, S., & Baca, M. (2011).Internet and political communication-Macedonian case. Faculty of organization and informatics. University of Zagreb.

12.Friedman, L.T. (2011, February 9). Up with Egypt. The New York Times.

13.Ghonim,W.( January 17, 2012). Revolution 2.0: the Power of the People Is Greater Than the People in Power: a Memoir. (Retrieved 23 September, 2012).

http://www.amazon.com/Revolution-2-0-People-Greater-

14.Glenn, G.& Sparke. (2010). Media effects research: A basic review. Wards worth, Boston.U.S.A

IJSER © 2014 http://www.ijser.org

International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 5, Issue 2, February-2014 1123

ISSN 2229-5518

15.Goodman, D.S. (2011). Social Media: The use of face book and twitter to impact political unrest in the Middle East through the power of collaboration. The faculty of Journalism Department. California polytechnic University, San Luis Obispo.
16Hamilton, S. (2009). Use of social media in Presidential campaigns: Do social media have and effect on political behavior of voters aged 18-24.Department of politics and International relations. Roger Williams University.
17.Herman,E.S.,& Chomisky,N.(2000).Manufacturing consent: The political economy of mass media.NewYork:Panteon Books.
18.Iskander, E. (2011). Connecting the national and virtual: Can face book activism remain relevant after Egypt’s January 25 Upspring. London School of Economics and Political Science.
19.Krikpatric,D.(2010). The Face book Effect. (Retrieved 23 September, 2012)
http://www.amazon.com/Face book-Effect-David- Kirkpatrick/dp/0753522748/ref=sr_1_2?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1348377257&sr=1-
2&keywords=Face book+effects.
20.Kristof, D.Nicholas. (2011, April 5).We are all Egyptians. The New York Times. (n.d)
21.Marcheva, M.(2010). The real political powers of internet: Face book, a possible new hub of

European elections? University of Pantheon Assas Paris.

22.Marichal, J. (2010). Political face book groups: Micro activism and the digital front stage. California Lutheran University.
23.Mainwaring, S.(2011, February 13) Re: Exactly what role did social media ply in the Egyptian revolution?
Message posted to.
24.http://simonmainwarning .com/face book/exactly-what-role-did-social-media-ply-in-the-egyptian- revolution/ ( Retrieved 15 September, 2012)
25.Marzouki, Y, & Hammoudi, H. (2012). The contribution of face book to the 2011 Tunisian revolution: A cyber psychological insight.

26.McKinney. (November 11, 2010). Communication in the 2008 U.S. Election (Frontiers in Political Communication). (Retrieved 23 September, 2012). http://www.amazon.com/Communication-2008- Election-Frontiers-Political/dp/1433109883/ref=sr_1_6?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1348377773&sr=1-

6&keywords=2008+U.S+Presidential+elections#reader_1433109883

27.McQuail,D.(2005).Mass Communication Theory,(3rd Edition)(Vistaar Publications, New Delhi)

pp.168,171.

28.Memoir/dp/0547773986/ref=sr_1_2?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1348378073&sr=1-

2&keywords=Egypt+revolution#reader_0547773986.

IJSER © 2014 http://www.ijser.org

International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 5, Issue 2, February-2014 1124

ISSN 2229-5518

http://www.amazon.com/2008-Presidential-Campaign-Communication- Perspective/dp/0742564355/ref=sr_1_2?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1348379176&sr=1-

2&keywords=2008+Presidential+elections#reader_0742564355.

29.Morozov, E. (2009) Iran: Downside to the “Twitter Revolution”. Dissent 56(4): 10-14.

30.Mourtada, R., & Salem, F. (2011). Civil movements.The impact of face book and twitter. Arab social Media Report.
31.Osama, A., & Samei, M.A. (2011). The media and the making of the 2011 Egyptian Revolution. Cairo University.
32.Payne, A. (2009). The new campaign, social networking sites in the 2008 Presidential elections.
Honors College Capstone Experience. Western Kentucky University.

33.Rafaeli, S. (1988). Interactivity: From New Media to Communication. In R. P. Hawkins, J. M. Wiemann & S. Pingree (Eds.), Advancing Communication Science: Merging mass and interpersonal processes (pp. 110-134). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

34.Raymond, W. & Preisis. (2001). Mass media effects researcher advance through Meta Analysis, publisher: Lawrene Erlbaum Association, Tnc Mahwah, and Newberys.)
35.Said,E.W.(1997). “The MESA debate: The scholars, the media and the Middle East”. Journal of

Palestine Studies, 16(2), 85-104.

36.Shaugnessy, & M.Stadler, J. (2010) Media and Society:
37.Shirky, C. (2011, February 13). The political power of social media. Foreign Affairs. (n .d)
38.Skoric,& Kwan. (2011).Do Face book and Video games promote political participation among youth. Wee Kim Wee School of communication and information, Nayang Technological University.
39.Small, T. (2009, January 5). The face book effect? Online campaigning in the 2008 Canadian and
US elections
40.Smith, K. (2011, November11). Re: Egypt’s face book revolution: Wael Ghonim Thanks the
Social Network. Message Posted to
41.http://www.huffing tonpost.com/2011/02/11 / Egypt-face book-revolution-wael-ghonim-n-
822078.html (Retrieved 17 September, 2012)
42.Smith, N.K (2011). Social media and political campaign. Tennessee Research and Creative
Exchange, University of Tennessee.

43.Stromer, J. (2003). Diversity of political conversation on the Internet: Users‘ perspectives. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 8, (3). Retrieved from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol8/issue3/stromergalley.html.

44.Sulehria, Farooq. (2011, February 9). Key players in Egypt’s revolution. The News International. (n.d).

IJSER © 2014 http://www.ijser.org

International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 5, Issue 2, February-2014 1125

ISSN 2229-5518

Valenzuela, S., Park, N., & Kee, F (2008). Lessons from face book: The effect of social network sites on College student’s social capital. University of Texas at Austin.
Vissers, S., & Stolle, D. (2012). Spill-over effects between facebbok and on/offline political participation? Evidence from a two-wave panel study. Canadian Political Science Association Annual Meeting.
Vitak, J., Zube, P., Smck, A., Carr, T. (2010), it’s complicated: Face book user’s political participation in 2008 elections. Cyber Psychology, behavior and social networking.
West, R. & Turner, L (2000), Introducing Communication Theory, Mayfield Publishing Company, London.
William, P., Dhavan V., & Nojin, K. (2005). Understanding the relationship between communication and political knowledge. Political Communication.
Wimmer, R.,& Dominick,J.,(2000) Mass Media Research: An Introduction,(6th
Edition),(Wadsworth Publishing Company),pp.88,392
http:// www.csa.com/discoveryguides/ discovery guides-main.php (Retrieved 16 September, 2012). http://www.docstoc.com/docs/36265100/final-synopsis doc (Retrieved 16 September, 2012) http://www.ecp.gov.pk (Retrieved 15 September, 2012) http//www.ecp.gov.pk/voterstats/agewise.pdf (Retrieved 16 September, 2012) http://www.education.com (Retrieved 16 September, 2012)
http://idia.library.drexel.edu/handle/1860/3408?mode=full&submit-simple=showt full + item + record
(Retrieved 15 September, 2012)
http://jadailya.com/pages/index/612/egypts-revolution-2.0-the face book-factor http://ndc.nic.in/uploads/editor-files/pdf/43-about.pdf (Retrieved 15 September, 2012) http://oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/media? Q=media (Retrieved 15 September, 2012)
http://www.revolution.net/2009/09/22face book-faster-politcal-engagement/ (Retrieved 15 September,
2012)
http://www.social bakers.com/elections/?ref= left=menu (Retrieved 15 September,2012) http://www.social bakers.com/face book statistics/Pakistan (Retrieved 15 September, 2012) http://tribune.com.pk/story 330906/over-6-million-Pakistan-on-face book/
(Retrieved 15 September, 2012)

IJSER © 2014 http://www.ijser.org