International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 6, Issue 3, March-2015 362

ISSN 2229-5518

Development and Performance Evaluation of an

Orange Juice Extractor

Adanu, E.O1, Usman D.D2. , and J. N. Maduako3

1 Department of Agriculture, Federal College of Education (Tech), P .O. Box 60, Gombe, Gombe State, Nigeria

2Department of Agricultural and Bioresource Engineering, Abubakar Tafawa Balewa University, P. M .B. 0248, Bauchi, Bauchi State, Nigeria.

3 Department of Agricultural and Environmental Engineering, Federal University of Technology, Owerri, Imo state, Nigeria.

E-mail: danladiusman123@yahoo.com, Phone no: 07036689063.

Abstract: The design and construction of orange Juice extraction was undertaken with the aim of achieving the extraction of pure orange Juice, free of squashed seeds and peels. The extractor consists of the cutting chamber which is made up of rotary shaft, knives attached at both ends and an inclined tray. W hile the squeezing chamber is made up of crankshaft, the rammer and a sieve. The machine has a shaft diameter of 12mm, torque and power transmitted as14252Nmm and 1.5kw respectively. The pulley has a linear speed of 10.74mls, the cross sectional area of the squeezing chamber (flat plate) was 12,000mm2 with a force of 5.32N on the plate due to pressure from the orange. W hile the net force acting on the plate was 3059N.The machine performance evaluation was carried out using tangelo and Tiv orange varieties. The actual efficiency of the machine was found to be 76.04% with a capacity of 6 l/hr (5.73kg/h). It was concluded that efficient Juice extraction would be better achieved with the use of this kind of machine than with a turning screw.

Key words: Orange Juice, cutting chamber, squeezing chamber, Extraction, Crank shaft.

1 Introduction

—————————— ——————————

developed fruits in advanced as well as developing
Citrus (Citrus sinensis) fruits are second only to apple in world trade and have been grown for millennia in their area of origin. They belong to six genera namely; fortunella, Eremocitrus, clymenia, poncitrus, microcitrus and citrus [1], but from an economic point of view, only furtunella, poncitrus and citrus fruits are important and the major commercial citrus fruits are eight species of the genus citrus. They are probably the most sought after fruits and consequently the most eagerly
countries, climate permitting [1].
The group (genus) citrus, comprises species in which sweet orange, grape fruits, lemon and lime are included. In the sweet orange, good varieties include Valencia, Washington Navel, king, Ibadan sweet, Nigerian green skin and tangelo. The fruit tree is grown very extensively in the southern guinea savanna and high rainfall areas of Nigeria [2]. Although the plant is well adapted to area with high rainfall, it can be grown further north as an irrigated tree crop.

IJSER © 2015 http://www.ijser.org

International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 6, Issue 3, March-2015 363

ISSN 2229-5518

Orange (citrus sinensis osbek) is the most popular among the citrus. Every parts of the orange including the ring have some nutritional value [3]. The fruit can be consumed raw or in form of juice, after peeling the ring. Orange Juice has become an indispensable part of our daily breakfast, it is considered as a fresh and perfectly nutrition way to start a day [4]. Like any other citrus fruits, oranges are also loaded with vitamin C. It contains minerals like calcium, sodium, potassium magnesium, phosphorus, copper, and sulphur. An orange also contains 15.4gms of carbohydrate, 12.2gms of sugar, 3gms of dietary fiber, 1gm of protein and
0.2gm of fat [4]. Apart from the vitamins and minerals, orange contains more than 170 phytonutrients, which include carotenoids, terpenoids, limonoids, glucarates,and flavanoids. Flavanoids, posses’ anti-inflammatory, anti- tumor and anti- carcinogenic properties. They also prevent blood clotting and thereby reduce the chances of coronary thrombosis. The carotenoids which have antioxidant properties help in the prevention of blindness after 65. As orange contain a good amount of fiber, they help in digestion and in
lowering blood sugar level. They fight colon cancer and diarrhea, prevent kidney stone formation, rheumatoid arthritis and cancer [4].
Today many people drink orange juice for breakfast, while lots of oranges waste due to inadequacy in the processing and preservation in the mist of great demand. In other words, there are few machines to match the growing demand for this product. Hence, the need to design and construct a hand-operational machine capable of extracting juice from the orange fruits.

2 Materials and Methods

2.1 Description of the orange juice extractor

The main feature of the extractor is shown in figure
1, which include the cutting chamber and the squeezing chamber working side by side each other. The cutting chamber is made up of flat metals attached to a rotary shaft fixed at both ends to the bearing, with knives held at 90o to a fixed base. When the orange rolls over an incline tray, it stops at the base of the knife edges where the rotary flat metal pushes it through the knives to produce orange fragments at the other end, which then fall off the cutting chamber into the squeezing chamber.

IJSER © 2015 http://www.ijser.org

International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 6, Issue 3, March-2015 364

ISSN 2229-5518

The squeezing chamber is made up of crankshaft, rammer and sieve with the fragmented oranges in the chamber. The rammer by means of a reciprocating rotary motion of the crankshaft, squeezes the juice out of the orange, the juice exuding through the sieve is pure.
The materials used for the construction of the orange juice extraction are: mild steel sheet, mild steel rods, brackets, sieve (stainless steel) and
stainless steel knives with shear strength of 41 to 48
GN/m2 [5]. The choice of these materials was based
on their unique properties that are adoptable to particular sections of the machine such properties include; durability, availability, machinability, cheapness light weight and malleability. The machine comprises the following components; shaft, pulley, hub, bearings, plunger (squeezing chamber), key and main body.

2.2 Design Calculations

Design of Shaft

The extractor consist of two shafts, the cutting shaft and the squeezing shaft (James, 1983). The shaft diameter is determined using equation (1) (Mott, 1985).

D3 = (16 /Ss + (KtMt)2 ……… 1

Where, D = diameter of shaft.mm

Ss = shear stress, Nmm2

KbKt = Combine shock and fatigue factors applied to the bending and torsion moment respectively.

Mt = torsional movement, Nmm

Ms = bending movement, Nmm

Design of Pulley

The pulley standard chamber and width of 200mm and

25 mm as given by james (1983). The linear speed of the pulley was obtained from equation (4)

Linear speed (v) = ……….4

Where, D = diameter, mm

N = number of rev.

Torque transmitted through the shaft is obtained from equation (2).

T = ………… 2

Where, T = torque

C = shear stress N/mm2

D = diameter, mm

Power transmitted by the extractor was calculated from equation (3)

P = …….. 3

IJ

http:

Design of hub.

The diameter and length of the hub where obtained from equation (5) and (6) respectively.

Diameter of hub (δ) = 2d ------ 5

Length of hub (L) = -------- 6

Where, d = diameter, mm

Design of key

Squeezing chamber (plunger)

The width, thickness and length of key where also obtained from equation 7, 8 and 9 where,

Width of key (w) = ……..7

Thickness of key (t) = ……….8

Length of key (l) = ------------9

Where, d = diameter, mm, w = width, mm

Design of bearing

Approximate service life of bearing (in revs) L = ( × 106 ……. 10

Where, c = dynamic radial load rating of ball bearing (144.25N)

k = 3. (For ball bearing). Reliability of the bearing (R)

Loge = ( ------- 11

Where, L = life span of bearing a = 6.84, and b = 1.17

me 6, Issu

Cross sectional area of flat plate

A = L × B………… 12

Where, L = length of plate

B = breadth of plate.

Force in the plate due to pressure from orange.

FL = P × A…………… 13

= P × L × B ………….. 14

Where, p = axial load (N)

A = area of plate (mm2)

Ratio of length of connecting rod to radius of crank. N = …………. 15

Where, L1 = length of connecting rod.

R = radius of crank. Net force acting on the plate.

Fp = fL + F1 ……………. 16

where, Fc = force on plate due to orange.

F1 = Initial force of reciprocating part. Force in connecting rod (fc)

………..17

365

2.3 Performance Evaluation.

The performance evaluation of the juice extractor involves evaluation of the machine’s capacity and efficiency. The parameters investigated include
capacity (kg/h) and efficiency (%). The parameter
were calculate using two varieties of orange namely tangelo and Tiv orange weighing 141 and 148g respectively. The orange weight and volume of whole orange peeling were determined, while
orange weight and volume of juice collected and

IJSER © 2015 http://www.ijser.org

International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 6, Issue 3, March-2015 366

ISSN 2229-5518

extracted, % by weight of juice extracted and orange squeezing time was all determined after subjecting the oranges to the machine.

3 Results and Discussion

Table 1 shows the design and calculated result while table 2 shows the average orange juice yield for the two orange varieties.

Table 1: Design Parameter

S/N

DESIGN PARAMETERS

RESULT

1

Shaft Design

Torgue transmitted through shaft, Nmm

14252

Power transmitted, kN

1.5

2

Pulley Design

Linear speed m/s

10.74

3

Design Of Hub

Diameter of hub, mm

24

Length of hub,mm

19

4

Design Of Key

Width of key, mm

3

Thickness of key, mm

2

Length of key, mm

19

5

Bearing Design

Life span of bearing, rev

106

Reliability of bearing, %

72

6

Squeezing Chamber ( Plunger)

Cross sectional area of flat plate,mm2

12000

Force on the plate due to pressure from

orange, N

5.32N

Ratio of length of connecting rod to radius

of crank.

6.67

Net force acting on the plate, N

3059

Force in connecting rod, N

3090

Calculated parameter

7 capacity (L/m

6.00

8 Efficiency (%)

76.04

Table 2: Average Juice Yield for Two Orange Varieties.

Orange

varieties

Av. wt.

of whole peeled orange

Av.

of whole peele

d orang

Av. wt of

juice collected (g)

Av. of

juice extracte d (cm3)

% by wt

of juice extracted (%)

Av.

squeezing time (s)

IJSER © 2015 http://www.ijser.org

International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 6, Issue 3, March-2015 367

ISSN 2229-5518

e

(cm3)

Tangello

Tiv orange

141

148

150

152

72.20

67.46

50.30

48.60

58.2

52.7

30

30

Table 3: Cost Analysis

ITEMS

Quantity

Unit cost(#)

Amount (#)

Angle iron

Bearings

Shaft

Metal sheet Weiding eletrate Paint

Labour

Transportation

1 length

4pieces

2×500mm

1length

1lump

-

-

-

1400

250

1000

600

200

1000

-

-

1400

1000

2000

600

200

1000

The power transmitted by the shaft was found to be
1.5kw, while torque transmitted by the shaft was
14252Nmm. The linear speed of pulley was
10.74m/s and they had diameter and length were 24 and 19mm respectively. The key width, thickness and length were found to be 3, 2 and 19mm respectively while reliability of the bearing was obtained at 72%. The cross sectional area and force on the flat plate due to pressure from orange(squeezing chamber) where 12,000 mm2 and
5.32N respectively. The net force acting on the plate
and the force in the connecting rod were 3059 and
3090N respectively.
The orange juice extraction was found to have a capacity of 6 l/hr (5.73kg/h) and an efficiency of

76.04%.

4 Conclusions

The development of the juice extraction was carried out with the aim of achieving efficient and quality juice extraction. The performance evaluation of the juice extractor showed that it can be used effectively for extracting juice from different

IJSER © 2015 http://www.ijser.org

International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 6, Issue 3, March-2015 368

ISSN 2229-5518

varieties of oranges especially tangelo and Tiv orange. The actual capacity of the extraction was 6 l/hr (5.73kg/h) with an efficiency of 76.04%. The juice extraction could overcome the waste due to inadequacy in processing and presentation of the orange as well as bridging the gap between demand and supply of orange juice.

5 REFERENCES

[1] Chapot. H. (1973). The citrus plant; plant production and protection division. FAO. Rome, Italy.
[2] Agricultural Extension and research liaison sources (AERLS,1987). A guide to the production of citrus, Ahmadu Bello
University, Samaru Zaria.
[3] Morton, J (1987). Fruit of warm climate http://www.hortpurdue.edu/newcrop/morto n/banana.html. Retrieved on 6/08/2012.
[4] Sonia, N. (2011). Nutritional facts about oranges; Calories in oranges. http://www.buzzle.com/articles/nutritional- facts-about-orange-calo rie s-in-
oranges.ht ml. Retrieved on 6/08/2012.
[5] Redford, G. D. (1975). Mechanical Engineering
Design, Macmillian Inc. Ltd., England.
[6] James, H.E (1983). Engineering design Graphics (4th edition). Addison –Wesley Educational Publishers Inc. United Kingdom.
[7] Mott, R.C (1985): Machine element in mechanics design., Merril publishing company. Columbia Tiront.

IJSER © 2015 http://www.ijser.org

International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 6, Issue 3, March-2015 369

ISSN 2229-5518


Fig. 1: Isometric drawing of orange juice extractor

IJSER © 2015 http://www.ijser.org

International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 6, Issue 3, March-2015 370

ISSN 2229-5518

fig.2: detailed drawings

IJSER © 2015 http://www.ijser.org