International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 5, Issue 4, April-2014 1451
ISSN 2229-5518
π±
Wafaa Ahmed Azeez, Bashair M.saied, Taghreed A.Younis
Department of Physics, University of Zakho
Department of physics, Dohok University
Department of physics, Baghdad University
Abstract:
The Ξ΄-mixing ratios have been calculated for several Ξ³-transitions in 90Mo using the π
π
method. The results are compared with other references
π
the agreement is found to be very good .this confirms the validity of the
π
method as a tool for analyzing the angular distribution of Ξ³-ray.
π
Key word: population parameter, Ξ³-ray transition,
π
method, multiple mixing ratios.
Introduction:
35 35 90
Angular distribution experiment using the reaction 28 ππ (17πΆπ ,3ππΎ)42ππ
has been performed at 120 MeV beam energy by kabadiyski et.at
35 35 90
[1] . Rasha J.T. calculate the multiple mixing ratios ,Ξ΄, of gamma transitions from levels excited in 28 ππ (17πΆπ ,3ππΎ)42ππ
constant statistical tensor and least square fitting methods .
by using a2 βratio,
IJSER Β© 2014 http://www.ijser.org
International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 5, Issue 4, April-2014 1452
ISSN 2229-5518
π
In the present work , the angular distribution of Ξ³-rays from this reaction are reanalyzed using
π
method [3] .This method depends on the
Gaussian distribution with its half-width Ο, where determined using the experimental angular distribution coefficients obtained for a selected number of well-known Ξ³-ray transitions from levels with different spin Ji Values , the main aim was to confirm the validity of this method as a tool for analyzing the angular distribution of Ξ³-ray.
Data Reduction & Analysis:
Yamaszaki [4] has shown that the population parameters of the magnetic sub states of an initial state with spin Ji and magnetic quantum number
P(mRiR)= β¦β¦β¦..(1)
Ji
m= -Ji
Where p(mi) represents the population parameters and Ο is the half-width of the Gaussian distribution.
In the present work, the half βwidth Ο, was determined as follows:
The experimental value of the angular distribution coefficient aR2R, of a certain and well known Ξ³-transition was used to calculate the statistical
tensor ΟR 2R(Ji) from the following equation [5]
F2 (L1L1Jf Ji) + 2 Ξ΄ F2 (L1L2Jf Ji) + Ξ΄ 2 F2 (L2L2Jf Ji)
aR2R = ΟR 2R (JRiR) QR2R β¦..(2) (1+ Ξ΄ 2 )
IJSER Β© 2014 http://www.ijser.org
International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 5, Issue 4, April-2014 1453
ISSN 2229-5518
Where Ξ΄ is the multiple mixing ratio Ji and Jf are the spin of initial and final states respectively L, is the angular momentum of Ξ³-ray with L2
= L1 +1 and Q is the attenuation factor which is considered here to be unity . The F2 -coefficients are tabulated in ref. [4,5,6] for integer and half
β integer J -values .
And
(JRoR JRoR ΧKRoR) for integer J β¦β¦.(4)
J-Β½
(JR1/2R J- Β½ KRoR) for half βinteger Jβ¦β¦(5)
The Ξ±R2R (JR iR) values are tabulated in ref. [6] for integer values of JRiR from 1 to 26 and half β integer values from 3/2 to 51/2 for
π
values from 0.1
π
to 2.0 each JR iR value .from these tables , the half β width , Ο was determined for the JR iR values and was used in eq. (1) to calculate population parameters p(mi). The population parameters of levels in 90Mo( computed by using computer program in mat lab language) , were it is almost constant for level , with the same JRiR value for both positive and negative parities , it , may, there for , be stated that population parameters of levels with the same JRiR value do not depend upon the energy of the level nor upon its parity . Tacking this fact into consideration, the population parameters thus calculated were used to cover all the possible transitions occurring in the present work.
IJSER Β© 2014 http://www.ijser.org
International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 5, Issue 4, April-2014 1454
ISSN 2229-5518
These statistical tensors were then used with F2 coefficient values to calculate the multipole mixing ratios of Ξ³-transition.
Result and discussion:-
1- If the differences between J f and Ji =2 and its parity is even, the transition will be pure E2 ,depending upon this fact the transition (7--5-)
must be pure E2, and this is what we reached it in present work , the πΏ- value for this transition 3367.4 keV (7--5-) from 818.4 keV
level equal (0.04) ,this πΏ - value is very small even it will be negative or positive by using Ξ΄2= π3 when we use , | J -J |β€ Lβ€ |
πΈ2
Ji+Jf| the magnetic transition will be odd value and the electric transition will be even value and M3+E2 =100% ,this mean that
this transition will be 99.8% E2 and (0.04) M3 ,this indicate that the πΏ- value in present work is accurate and agreement with that in ref[1
] ,[ 2].
This rule will applied for other transitions:
4192.5keV | (10+-8+) from | 1317.7keV | E2=99.999 |
4555.8 keV | (12+-10+) from | 477.0keV | E2=99.998 |
5699.6 keV | (13--11-) from | 857.5keV | E2=99.910 |
5625.0 keV | (14+-12+) from | 1069.1keV | E2=99.990 |
6643.1 keV | (15--13-) from | 943.5keV | E2=99.997 |
7515.1 keV | (17--15-) from | 872.8keV | E2=99.990 |
8525.4 keV | (18+-16+) from | 1779.2keV | E2=99.960 |
9319.1 keV | (19--17-) from | 1804.0ke | E2=99.999 |
IJSER Β© 2014 http://www.ijser.org
International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 5, Issue 4, April-2014 1455
ISSN 2229-5518
The results of the present work are agreement with other refs [1,2 ] except that the (20+ -18+) transition.
2-If the difference between Ji and Jf =0 or 1,and have odd parity ,the transition will be pure E1, depending upon this fact the (15-- 14+)
transition must be pure E1 this indicated that our πΏ-value , results for 6643.1 keV (15--14+) from 1018.1 keV are true and by using Ξ΄2= π2 ,the
πΈ1
magnetic transition must be even and electric transition will be odd and E1+M2= 100% this mean that E1=99.999% and M2=0.002% ,this
indicate the πΏ-values present work for this transition are true and in good agreement with that in refs[1,2 ] . and this rules also will be applied
for other transition (17--16+) from 7515.1 keV which have E1=99.99% and M2= 0.004% ,however for (11- -10+ ) 4842.1 keV from 649.6 keV
and 5699.6 keV (13- -12+ ) from 1143.8 keV our results show that this transitions are not pure transition even its they have odd parity .This indicate that the experimental results are inaccurate and this ensured by experimental results from ref[1 ] where presented that this transitions
are not E1 and it may be have small πΏ-value.
Conclusion:-
The results of the present work are in very good agreement with those of ref. [1,2] from these comparisons, it may be concluded that the π
π
π
method is a powerful tool for analyzing angular distributions of Ξ³-ray .it should also be mentioned that the calculations based on the
π
can be performed using an ordinary personal computer.
method
IJSER Β© 2014 http://www.ijser.org
International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 5, Issue 4, April-2014 1456
ISSN 2229-5518
Table (2) Multipole mixing Ratios of Ξ³- transition from level of 90MO Using Ο/J Method
RiR
RΞ³R
π’ π
IJSER Β© 2014 http://www.ijser.org
International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 5, Issue 4, April-2014 1457
ISSN 2229-5518
5699.6 | 857.7 | - - 13 -11 | 0.34(2) -0.09(2) | -1.0513 | E2 | -0.02(2) | 0.01(2) | β ( π. ππ+π.ππ ) βπ.ππ (π. π+π.π ) βπ.π |
5699.6 | 1143.8 | 13--12+ | -0.28(2) 0.03(2) | -1.0513 | -0.02(5) | -0.02(2) | -0.03(1) | - 0.29(1) - (ππ. π+π.π ) βπ.π |
5625.0 | 1069.1 | + 14 -12+ | 0.35(2) -0.11(33) | -1.0312 | E2 | 0.00(2) | 0.01(2) | - (π. ππ+π.ππ ) βπ.πππ (π. π+π.π ) βπ.π |
6643.1 | 943.5 | 15--13- | 0.33(2) 0.04(2) | -0.92332 | E2 | 0.00(2) | -0.01(2) | 0.005(0.015) (π. π+π.π ) βπ.π |
6643.1 | 1018.1 | - + 15 β 14 | -0.23(2) 0.03(3 | -0.92332 | 0.01(6) | 0.00(2) | 0.01(2) | β (π. πππ+π.πππ ) βπ.πππ - (ππ. π+π.π ) βπ.π |
IJSER Β© 2014 http://www.ijser.org
International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 5, Issue 4, April-2014 1458
ISSN 2229-5518
7515.1 | 872.0 | - - 17 - 15 | 0,29(2) -0.05(2) | -0.8003 | E2 | 0.01(3) | -0.05(2) | (π. ππ+π.ππ ) βπ.πππ 4.5(5) |
7515.1 | 768..9 | - + 17 -16 | -0.19(2) 0.07(2) | -0.8003 | 0.02(6) | 0.01(2) | 0.03(1) | (π. πππ+π.πππ ) βπ.πππ - (ππ. π+π.π ) βπ.π |
8525.4 | 1779.2 | + + 18 -16 | 0.33(4) -0.05(4) | -0.89717 | E2 | 0.00(5) | -0.02(3) | (π. ππ+π.ππ ) βπ.ππ (π. π+π.π ) βπ.π |
9319.1 | 1804.0 | - - 19 -17 | 0.34(6) -0.02(6) | -0.97766 | E2 | 0.00(7) | -0.01(5) | (π. πππ+π.πππ ) βπ.πππ (π. π+π.π ) βπ.π |
10235.2 | 1709.9 | 20+-18+ | 0.37(3) -0.03(4) | -0.7321 | E2 | 0.00(3) | 0.01(3) | 0.14(4) 2.7(3) |
IJSER Β© 2014 http://www.ijser.org
International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 5, Issue 4, April-2014 1459
ISSN 2229-5518
Table (1) Statistical tensor coefficient, half width and attenuation coefficients for 90Mo[1,2]
ππ’
β ππ
οΏ½π±
IJSER Β© 2014 http://www.ijser.org
International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 5, Issue 4, April-2014 1460
ISSN 2229-5518
6643.1 | 1018.1 943.5 | 15- -14+ 15- β 13- | -0.23(2) 0.03(3) 0.33(2) 0.04(2) | -1.119749 | 0.836220 0.83622 | 3.75 | 0.25 | -093635(4656) | -0.92332499 |
7515.1 | 872.0 768.9 | 17- -15- 17- -16+ | 0.29(2) -0.05(2) -0.19(2) 0.07(2) | -1.119408 -1.119375 | 0.728658 0.728677 | 5.1 | 0.3 | -0.81566(4707) | -0.8003 |
IJSER Β© 2014 http://www.ijser.org
International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 5, Issue 4, April-2014 1461
ISSN 2229-5518
8525.4 | 1779.2 | 18+ -16+ | 0.33(4) -0.05(4) | -1.119270 | 0.851045 | 4.5 | 0.25 | -0.95255(11546) | -08971702 |
9319.1 | 1804.0 | 19- -17- | 0.34(6) -0.02(6) | -1.119130 | 0.88060 | 3.8 | 0.2 | -0.98551(17391) | 0.9776691 |
10235.2 | 1709.9 | 20+ -18+ | 0.37(3) -0.03(4) | -1.119057 | 0.961988 | 2 | 0.1 | -1.07652(8729) | -0.7321 |
Reference:-
1- Kabadiyski M.K ., Cross G.J., Harder A.,Lieb K.P.,Rudilph D.,weiszflog M.,ALtamann J.,Dewald A., Eberth J., Mylacus I.,Graw
H.,Heese J.,and Maier K.H.,(1994),phys.Rev.C50,110.
2- Tammy R.J.,(2004) , ph.D.thesis, Multipole Mixing Ratios of gamma β rays from different Nuclear Reactions ,University of AL- Mustansiriyah.
3- Ameen M.M.,(1999) , ph.D.thesis ,University of Baghdad .
4- Yamazaki T. ,(1967) ,Nuclear data ,Tables A3.,1.
5- Poletti A.R. and Warburton E.K. (1965), Study of the low βlying levels of F18 by means of the O16(He3 ,pΞ³) F18 Reaction; Phys. Rev. B595. Volume
137 ,Issue . .
6- Der Mateosain E.,and A.W.sunyar; (1974) , Atomic Data and Nucl .Data tables 13,391.
IJSER Β© 2014 http://www.ijser.org