International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 5, Issue 12, December-2014 104

ISSN 2229-5518

Surface Integrity analysis in Wire-Cut Electric Discharge Machining of Al 6063/Al2O3 Metal Matrix Composite through Response Surface Methodology

K.Hemalatha1, V.S.K.Venkatachalapathy2 N.Alagumurthy3

Abstract— The development of new, superior engineering materials and the need for precise and low-volume production have made the wire electrical discharge machining (EDM) an important manufacturing process to meet such demands. This research investigates the effect of pulse on-time, pulse off-time and servo feed, three important W EDM process in obtaining good surface finish, optimized material removal rate and kerf on newly formulated Aluminum 6063/Al 2 O 3 composite. Stir casting process is adopted for casting the composite plates with varying mass percentage of alumina (3%, 6%, 9%). The distribution of alumina and aluminium is examined by microstructure analysis, and the material is tested for its mechanical properties such as tensile strength and hardness. The effects of the parameters on the responses were evaluated by response surface methodology, which is based on optimization results. On the basis of optimization results it has been found that a pulse duration (Ton) of 3μs & pulse off time (Toff) 17μs and servo feed 7mm/min, which are the best combination of this analysis.

Index Terms— Surface integrity, Aluminum-Alumina composite, Stir casting process, wire electrical discharge machining, pulse on-time, pulse off-time, servo speed, weight percentage of alumina, response surface methodology, kerf, surface roughness

—————————— ——————————

1 INTRODUCTION

he development of new, superior engineered materials and the necessitate for light weight, high stiffness, good wear resistance and low thermal expansion coefficient
lead to the development of Al/ Al2 O3 Metal Matrix Composite. Its main function is to transmit and distribute the load to the reinforcement or fibers. This transfer of load depends on the bonding which depends on the type of matrix and reinforce- ment and the fabrication technique.[1,2] . Nowadays research- ers all over the world are focusing mainly on Aluminium be- cause of its unique combination of good corrosion resistance, low density and excellent mechanical properties. The unique thermal properties of Aluminium composites such as metallic conductivity with coefficient of expansion that can be tai- lored down to zero, add to their prospects in aerospace and avionics. [3, 4].
Also, the practice of hard and difficult to machine ma- terials, due to its brilliant technological properties, is exten- sively used in various sectors in modern manufacturing indus- tries. Owing to, its excellent properties and behavior in these
Wire-Cut Electro Discharge Machining (EDM) is a brilliant solution to this problem, It is generally used to machine diffi- cult-to-machine materials, high strength, temperature resistant alloys and manufacturing of tools and dies for machining cavi- tities and counter shaping and cutting.[5]

2 MATERIALS AND METHODS

The material used in the present investigation consists of Al- uminium alloy (Al6063) as the base matrix alloy. Its Chemical composition (%) is Mg = 0.45-0.9, Si=0.2-0.6, Fe=0.35max, Cu=0.1max, Mn=0.1max, Zn=0.1max, Ti=0.1max, Cr=0.1max, Al=balance. It posses high heat dissipation capacity and is suitable for high strength and high temperature applications. The aluminium matrix was reinforced with Al2 O3 of 46 mi- crons in varying percentage of 3%, 6% and 9%.
Typical Stir casting Process includes:
applications even more challenging, its transformation and Step1: Aluminium alloy is melted at 8000C in muffle
processing they present problems which limit the accuracy and rising production costs. Consequently, the machining of
furnace for two hours
Step2:Alumina is melted at 1000 C in another muffle
furnace for same time period

————————————————

K.Hemalatha currently pursuing Ph.D degree program in Mechanical engineering in Pondicherry Engineering College, India, E-mail: hemalatharohit@gmail.com

Dr.V.S.K.Vemkatachalapathy, Professor, Department of Mechanical

Engineering, Sri Manakula Vinayagar Engineering College, Puducher- ry, India,Email:vskvenkatachalapathy@yahoo.com

Dr.N.Alagumurthi, Professor, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Pondicherry Engineering College, Puducherry, India

such material in an efficient manner is a challenge.
 Step3:Melted Aluminium & Alumina are mixed in the
graphite crucible and 5gm of coverall, nucleant & degasser are
added in the melt
 Step4:After adding all these, the crucible is kept
inside the furnace
 Step5:The molten metal are stirred at speed of 200rpm
for 10minutes
 Step6:At the same time, dies are preheated at 3000 C
in another muffle furnace for 2 hours

IJSER © 2014

http://www.ijser.org

International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 5, Issue 12, December-2014 105

ISSN 2229-5518

 Step7:Finally the molten metal poured into the preheated die and then the metal is allowed to solidify

3 TESTING AND RESULTS

For the safe design and usage of these composite plates, it is essential that their ultimate strength and mechanical proper- ties need to be determined. Hence various tests are conducted using the fabricated plates.

3.1 Tensile Test

The important properties which come into play when a com- ponent is subjected to tensile loads are strength, Elasticity & Ductility. The graph below explains detail about the above parameters. From the cast MMC the standard tensile specimen were prepared by machining as per dimensions of ASTM E8. To obtain mechanical properties, specimens with overall length 100mm, thickness of 6mm and a gauge length of 25mm were tested in UNITEX-94100 Universal Testing machine.

3.2 Micro Hardness

Hardness is often a function of the particle size, porosity, and binder material. Hardness is very important to the success of machining operations. The hardness of the samples was measured using UHL Vickers micro hardness measuring ma- chine by applying a load of 0.5Kg and this load was applied
high/low temperature behavior, wear resistance, and so on, which in turn govern the application of these materials in in- dustrial practice.

Fig.1. SEM Image of Al6063+9% Al2O3

TABLE 1

HARDNESS VALUE

for 20 seconds. In order to eliminate the possibility of error a minimum of four hardness readings were taken for each sam- ple.

3.3 Microstructure Analysis

Microstructure is defined as the structure of a prepared sur- face or thin foil of material as revealed by a microscope above
25× magnification. The microstructure of a material (which can be broadly classified into metallic, polymeric, ceramic and composite) can strongly influence physical properties such as strength, toughness, ductility, hardness, corrosion resistance,

Fig.2. SEM Image of Al6063+6% Al2O3

Fig.3. SEM Image of Al6063+3% Al2O3

The above SEM images shows creation of grain boundaries the structures show loosely formed grains with Unmodified Vermicular. Silicon segregation in arranged manner of dendrites leading to a “shrinkage prone site”. This happen

IJSER © 2014 http://www.ijser.org

International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 5, Issue 12, December-2014 106

ISSN 2229-5518

due to poor grain refinement as well as poor modification. Thus the casting has all the following defects like shrinkage, gas holes & inclusions. Similar results are reported by [6,7].

4 WIRE EDM

Wire EDM (Electrical Discharge Machining) uses electric current and fine wire to cut conductive materials. The cutting typically occurs while the object is submerged in de-ionized water, which helps to cool the process and flush away the cut material. It leaves a smooth surface that often requires no fur- ther finishing or polishing. Noted that the cutting wire should not touch the material and that the cutting itself is due to the erosion that occurs when a spark forms between the cutting wire and the raw material.

Fundamental WEDM Settings:

The pulse on-time, pulse off-time, servo feed are the basic
machine settings.
Other Initial settings include:
Wire diameter: 0.25mm
Wire tension: 0-26 A
Fluid resistivity: 5x104 Ohm-cm
Fluid Pressure: 12Kg/Cm2

.

5 RESPONSE SURFACE METHODOLOGY

It is multi-response parametric optimization tool which is

TABLE 2

THE VALUES AND LEVELS OF THE PROCESS PARAMETERS

used to determine the factor levels that will concurrently suit a

TABLE 3

DESIGN MATRIX AND EXPERIMENTAL RESULT FOR 3% ALUMINA

INPUT PARAMETER

RESPONSE

R u n

Fac- tor 1

P-ON (µS)

Fac- tor2

P- OFF (µS)

Factor3

Servo

Feed

(mm/

min)

Re- sponse

1 SR

(µm)

Re- spons e2

Kerf

(µm)

Re- spons e3

MRR (mm2/ min)

1

6

11

5

2.6

287

39.9

2

6

17

9

2.2

291

40

3

6

14

7

2.88

289

38.956

4

6

14

7

2.7

287

39

5

6

14

7

2.7

290

38

6

6

17

5

2.45

290

38

7

9

14

5

3

288

35

8

6

11

9

3.5

292

36

9

3

11

7

2.4

284

40

10

9

11

7

3.3

299

37

11

3

14

9

2.22

282.5

41.89

12

3

14

5

2.11

282

42

13

9

17

7

3

296

38

14

3

17

7

2.1

280

43.8

15

9

14

9

2.9

298

35

TABLE 4

ANNOVA TABLE FOR THE FITTED MODEL: (KERF VALUES)

set of desired Specifications and to resolve the optimum combination of factors that yields a preferred response and describe the response near the optimum.

IJSER © 2014 http://www.ijser.org

International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 5, Issue 12, December-2014 107

ISSN 2229-5518

TABLE 6

ANNOVA TABLE FOR THE FITTED MODELS:

(SURFACE ROUGHNESS)

TABLE 10

DESIGN MATRIX AND EXPERIMENTAL RESULT FOR 6% ALUMINA

Source

Degrees of

freedom

Sum of

Squares

Mean

Square

F-ratio

P- Value

Model

3

2.00

0.67

12.40

0.0007

A- Pulse on-time

1

1.42

1.42

26.42

0.0003

B- Pulse off-time

1

0.53

0.53

9.78

0.0096

C- Servo feed

1

0.054

0.054

1.01

0.3358

TABLE 7

R-SQUARED VALUES (SURFACE ROUGHNESS VALUES)

Std. Dev.

0.23

R-Squared

0.7718

Mean

2.67

Adj R-Squared

0.7096

C.V. %

8.68

Pred R-Squared

0.5288

PRESS

1.22

Adeq Precision

11.319

TABLE 8

ANNOVA TABLE FOR THE FITTED MODELS

(MATERIAL REMOVAL RATE)

Source

Degrees of

freedom

Sum of

Squares

Mean

Square

F- ratio

P- Value

Model

3

70.81

23.60

12.99

0.0006

A- Pulse on-time

1

64.35

64.35

35.41

0.0001

B- Pulse off-time

1

5.95

5.95

3.27

0.0977

C- Servo feed

1

0.51

0.51

0.28

0.6086

TABLE 9

R-SQUARED VALUES

(MATERIAL REMOVAL RATE)

TABLE 5

R-SQUARED VALUES (KERF VALUES)

Std. Dev.

2.51

R-Squared

0.8459

Mean

289.03

Adj R-Squared

0.8038

C.V. %

0.87

Pred R-Squared

0.6811

PRESS

143.90

Adeq Precision

13.28

IJSER © 2014 http://www.ijser.org

International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 5, Issue 12, December-2014 108

ISSN 2229-5518

TABLE 12

R-SQUARED VALUES (KERF VALUES)

TABLE 15

ANNOVA TABLE FOR THE FITTED MODELS: (MATERIAL RE-

MOVAL RATE)

TABLE 13

ANNOVA TABLE FOR THE FITTED MODELS:

(SURFACE ROUGHNESS)

TABLE 16

R-SQUARED VALUES (MATERIAL REMOVAL RATE)

STD. DEV. 1.05 R-SQUARED 0.7633

MEAN 44.11 ADJ R-SQUARED 0.6987

C.V. % 2.39

PRED R-SQUARED 0.5405

TABLE 11

ANNOVA TABLE FOR THE FITTED MODEL: (KERF VALUES) PRESS 23.76 ADEQ PRECISION 11.301

SOURCE

DOF SUM OF

SQUARES

MEAN

SQUARE

F-

RATIO

P- VALUE

R-SQUARED VALUES (SURFACE ROUGHNESS VALUES)

MODEL 3 102.03 34.01 32.38 0.0001

A-

PULSE ON-TIME

1 67.28 67.28 64.06 0.0001

B- PULSE OFF-

TIME

1 22.63 22.63 21.55

0.0007

C- SERVO FEED

1 12.12 12.12 11.54 0.0060

IJSER © 2014 http://www.ijser.org

International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 5, Issue 12, December-2014 109

ISSN 2229-5518

TABLE 17

DESIGN MATRIX AND EXPERIMENTAL RESULT FOR 9% ALU-

MINA

TABLE 19

R-SQUARED VALUES (KERF VALUES)

STD. DEV.

1.98

R-SQUARED

0.7763

MEAN

272.95

ADJ R-SQUARED

0.6993

C.V. %

0.73

PRED R-SQUARED

0.4999

PRESS

91.65

ADEQ PRECISION

10.797

TABLE 18

ANNOVA TABLE FOR THE FITTED MODEL: (KERF VALUES)

TABLE 21

R-SQUARED VALUES (SURFACE ROUGHNESS VALUES)

Source

DOF

Sum of

Squares

Mean

Square

F- ratio

P- Value

Model

3

139.95

46.65

11.85

0.0009

A- Pulse on-time

1

28.12

28.12

7.14

0.0217

B- Pulse off-time

1

106.95

106.95

27.17

0.0003

C-Servo feed

1

4.88

4.88

1.24

0.2891

IJSER © 2014 http://www.ijser.org

International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 5, Issue 12, December-2014 110

ISSN 2229-5518

REFERENCES

TABLE 22

ANNOVA TABLE FOR THE FITTED MODELS: (MATERIAL RE-

MOVAL RATE)

[1] B.Bobic, S.Mitrovic, M.Babic, I.Bobic“Corrosion of Metal-Matrix Composites with

Aluminium Alloy Substrate”, Tribology in industry, Volume 32, No. 1, (2010)

[2] Vijaya Kumar Bhanot, Dharminder Singh, “Research work on Composite Epoxy Matrix & Ep Polyester reinforced material”, International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology, Vol.2, No.1,(2013)

[3]T. P. Rajan, R. M. Pillai and B. C. Pai, “Review Rein-forcement Coatings and Interfaces in Aluminium Metal Matrix Composites,” Journal Material Science, Vol. 33, No. 14, pp. 3491-3503,( 1998)

[4 ]Mohd Dan.ish, Dr.M.Arif Siddique, “Microstructural & Morphological Evolutions of

Al-Al2O3 Powder Composite during Ball Milling”, International Journal of

Engineering Research & Technology, Vol.1, No.10,(2012)

TABLE 23

R-SQUARED VALUES (MATERIAL REMOVAL RATE)

TABLE 20

ANNOVA TABLE FOR THE FITTED MODELS: (SURFACE ROUGH-

NESS)

Std. Dev.

1.65

R-Squared

0.8199

Mean

47.11

Adj R-Squared

0.7708

C.V. %

3.51

Pred R-Squared

0.6227

PRESS

62.89

Adeq Precision

10.754

6 CONCLUSION

In the research work, a newly formulated composites (Al- Al2 O3 ) is prepared by the stir casting process. In this stir casting method of casting Al 6063 plate is casted with varying mass of Al2 O3 (3%, 6%, 9%). Also the distribution of Alumina and Aluminium is examined by microstructure analysis, hardness distribution and the material is tested for its mechanical properties such as tensile strength and hardness.
1. The results confirmed that stir casted Al alloy 6063 with Al2 O3 reinforced composite is clearly superior to base alloy Al6063 in the comparison of tensile strength as well as hard- ness.
2. Tensile strength of Al composite was improved by the addi- tion of the Al2 O3 particles.
3. The Percentage elongation of the composite decreased with increase in Al2 O3 content, which confirms that alumina addi- tion increases brittleness.
4. Increasing of hardness with increasing weight percentage of Al2 O3 particles is mainly due to grain refinement and particle strengthening effects.
5. We found that with respect to decrease in pulse on-time, and weight percentage of alumina the kerf decreased
6. With respect to increase in pulse off-time and weight per- centage of alumina surface roughness decreased with increase in surface integrity (Surface finish and texture)

[5] Sanjay Kumar Majhi, M. K. Pradhan, Hargovind Soni, “Optimization of EDM Parameters Using Integrated Approach of RSM, Gray And Entropy Method”, International Journal of Applied Research in Mechanical Engineering (IJARME) ISSN: 2231 –5950, Volume-3, Issue-1, 2013]

[6] Lloyd D.J., “The solidification Microstructure of Particular Reinforcement

Al/SiCComposite”, Scie.Technology, 35:59,(1989)

[7] Long S, Befford O and Bonjour C., “Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of a High Volume Fraction Particle Reinforcement AlCu4MgAg Squeeze Casting’’, Materials Science and Engineering, No.269: 175-185,(1999)

IJSER © 2014 http://www.ijser.org