International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 4, Issue 12, December-2013 1952

ISSN 2229-5518

Influence of Socio Economic Status On Academic Achievement Of Secondary School Students Of Lucknow City

Ritu Chandra and Prof. (Dr. ) Shaikh Azimuddin

Abstract

Socio Economic Status has always influenced the Academic Achievement of students. Academic Achievement varies for children from different social backgrounds. Their academic performance is an outcome of their social status. Previous studies have shown that Parent’s Socio Economic Status is strongly associated with students’ academic performance. The present study examines the influence of different categories of SES of students on their academic achievement. The study also examines the relationship between SES and Academic achievement of 14 Secondary school students of Lucknow city of Uttar Pradesh (India) The age range varies from 13years to 17 years. The sample of the study comprised of 614 students (358 males and 256 females) from classes IX and X. The Socio Economic Status scale developed by Dr. Meenakshi (2004) is used for collection of data. The board results of class IX and X are used for assessment of academic achievement. The statistical measures like t-test and Karl Pearson’s correlation coefficient is used. The result of the study reveals the difference between high, average and low SES groups and their academic achievement. A positive correlation is observed between SES and Academic achievement. Based on these findings some recommendations are given for practice and further studies.

Keywords: Academic Achievement, Socio Economic Status, Secondary Schools, T-test, ANOVA, Karl Pearson’s Correlation coefficient

——————————  ——————————

IJSER

Introduction

International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 4, Issue 12, December-2013 1953

ISSN 2229-5518

Socio Economic status is the most important variable in determining the Academic Achievement of students. Increasingly, researchers examined educational processes, including academic achievement ,in relation to socio economic background.(Bornstein and Bradley,2003;Brooks-Gunn and Duncan,1997;Coleman1988;McLoyd,1998).The Socio Economic Status of a child is most commonly determined by combining parents’ educational level ,occupational status and income level (Jeynes 2002).Studies have repeatedly found that SES affects student’s outcomes.(Baharudin andLuster1998,Jeynes2002,Eamon2005,Majorib anks1996, Hocschild2003, Mcneal2001,Seyfried
1998). Researchers found that the Socio economic Status ,parental involvement and family size are particularly important family factors.(majoribanks1996) Families with high
socio economic status often have more success
children’s preparation for school and hence inadequately prepared for school.( Zill,
Collins, West and Hausken1995) stated that low maternal education and minority language status are most consistently associated with fewer signs of emerging literacy and a greater number of difficulties in preschoolers. Having inadequate resources affect negatively family’s decision for young children’s development and learning. The nature of the relationship between socio economic status (SES) and student achievement has been debated for decades, the most influential argument is “Equality of Educational opportunity” Coleman, etal.1968 and “Inequality” Jencks, etal. 1973 in the United States of America. How SES influences students academic achievement has been explained based on various theories. Few theories say that students from low SES homes lack an academic environment at home and
which in turn influences their academic

IJSER

in preparing their young children for school
because they have access to a wide range of
resources to promote and support young children’s development. They are able to provide their young children with high quality care, amenities and facilities. Crnic and Lamberty (1994) discussed the impact of socio economic status on children’s readiness for school. White (1982) carried out first Meta – analytic study to review the literature on this subject published before 1980 to examine the relationship between SES and academic achievement and showed that the relation varies significantly with a number of factors such as the types of SES and academic achievement measures.
Students who have a low SES earn low test
scores and drop out of school.(Eamon2005,Horchschild2003) The low SES affects academic achievement as it prevents access to important resources and creates stress at home.(Eamon2005,Majoribanks1996,Jeynes
2002) Low SES leads to family problems and
disrupted home environment and as a result the academic performance of the child.
Even in families with above average income
,parents lack time and energy to invest in their
achievement. Another scenario argues that
school and neighborhood environment
influences academic achievement as low SES schools are generally low in performance. How government interprets the influence of SES and achievement leads to policy decisions. Although contribution of SES must be examined both at school and student level but the present study is limited to influence of family SES on academic achievement of students in school.

Previous Studies:

Ganguly Malabika (1989) revealed in his study of socio economic status and scholastic achievement a relationship between the two in a particular setting. The study investigated the difference in scholastic achievement of upper, middle and lower socio-economic groups of students. The major findings of the study were the mean achievement scores of the upper SES groups of urban areas in all the three groups of subjects different significantly from those of the lower groups. The upper SES groups had done better in all the three groups of subjects. The mean scores in the upper socio-economic status and lower socio economic status of rural areas differed significantly. The difference between the means in all the areas of

International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 4, Issue 12, December-2013 1954

ISSN 2229-5518

achievement was found to be significant. Trivedi, Vineeta (1988) conducted a study of the relationship between socio economic background and academic achievement among the intermediate students. The sample consisted of 523 girls students from 11 institutions. The finding of the study revealed a significant relationship between socio- economic status and academic achievement. The students of upper SES showed better achievement than the students of lower SES group. Rupa Das Barbora (2001) conducted a study on the academic achievements of children belonging to the background classes focusing on Kamrup District Assam to find out the causes of their low academic achievements. It was found that the children of literate parents show better academic achievement than the children of illiterate parents. The academic achievement of Girls is better than that of the boys. Seluck, R. Sirin 2005
conducted a meta Analysis to review the

Hypotheses of the Study

1. There is no significant difference between Socio Economic Status and academic achievement of secondary school students.

1.1. There is no significant difference between academic achievement of high SES and Average SES category secondary school students.
1.2. There is no significant difference
between academic achievement of average
socio economic status and Low socio economic status category secondary school students.
1.3. There is no significant difference
between academic achievement of High
and low socio economic status category secondary school students.

2. There is no significant relationship

IJSER

literature on Socio Economic status and
academic achievement between 1990 and 2000
to see whether the SES achievement correlation had changed since white’s initial review was published. The results showed a slight decrease in the average correlation. Andrew Mc Conney (2010) conducted a study to show that both students and school socio economic status are strongly associated with student outcomes. It was found that mathematics achievement was greater in higher SES school as compared with lower SES schools. The Influence of SES and its variables on academic achievement is very complex. The present study is aimed at achieving the following objectives.

1. To study the influence of Socio Economic Status on academic achievement of secondary school students.

2. To study the relationship between Socio Economic status and Academic Achievement of secondary school students.

between socio economic status and Academic achievement of secondary school students.

Justification of the Study

The process of education aims at enhancing the academic performance of the students. Only a holistic approach can yield result to improve learning outcomes of the students. Although Academic performance is dependent on many variables like intelligence, socio economic status, personal characteristics, attitude, values, environment etc. But socio economic status is one of the major variable affecting the academic achievement .The society is divided into many classes and on the basis of parents affiliation with a certain class, they send their ward to schools accordingly. Hence the parents SES is an important factor which contributes towards child’s education.
To optimize the educational opportunities, it is necessary to find out the relation between the SES and academic achievement and to what extend SES influences the academic achievement so that the academic achievement

International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 4, Issue 12, December-2013 1955

ISSN 2229-5518

of secondary school students could be increased.

Methodology

The descriptive method of research was adopted for this study. A sample of 614 secondary school students (male 358, female256) was collected from 14 schools of Lucknow city, Uttar Pradesh in India. Purposive sampling was used to collect the sample of the study. The sample age ranges from 13-17 years both males and females.

Tools

1. Socio-Economic status scale for assessment of SES by Dr. Meenakshi (2004) was used.
2. The Board Results of students from school record for measuring their academic achievement were used.
The above table1 shows that the total number of High SES category students is 263. The mean of the Academic achievement score of High SES students is 74.91 and Standard Deviation of students of high SES is 9.484.The S.Em. of students of High SES is 0.585. The Average SES category students are 312 in number. The mean of Academic Achievement score of Low SES students is 64.48 and Standard Deviation is 10.696.The S.Em. of students of low SES is 0.606. The t-value is
12.265 at 573 degree of freedom which is
significant at 0.05 level of significance; hence the null hypothesis is rejected. It means that there is significant difference between Academic achievement of high SES category and average SES category secondary school students. Students belonging to high SES have higher academic achievement as compared to
average SES students. As they have better

IJSER

Result and Analysis

Table1
Significance of the Difference Between Means of Academic Achievement of High Socio Economic Status and Average Socio Economic Status Students
df =573,*significant at 5%
exposure and environment. They go to schools
with better infrastructure and facilities. The
teachers, tutors and guidance of parents is also available to them. They have healthy competitive environment for improving their academic achievement.

Ganguly Malabika (1989) in their

study Socio Economic States and Scholastic ievement revealed that the upper and er socio economic status groups of urban s differed significantly in their mean es from those of the upper socio economic us and lower socio economic status of rural s. The difference between the means in all areas of achievement was found to be
significant. The results are depicted in the figure1 below:

International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 4, Issue 12, December-2013 1956

ISSN 2229-5518

350

300

250

200

150

100

SES

Std.

263

312

school students is 6.487 at 349 degree of freedom which is significant at 0.05 level of
significance hence the null hypothesis is rejected. It means that there is significant difference between academic achievement of average Socio Economic Status category and low Socio Economic Status category secondary school students .
Hari Krishnan M. (1992) in his study ‘A Study
of Academic Achievement of the students of

350

300

250

200

150

100

50

0

Figure 2 Academic Achievement
Scores of Average and Low Socio Economic
Status Students

Average

SES

Low SES

International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 4, Issue 12, December-2013 1957

ISSN 2229-5518

Table3
Significance of the Difference Between Means
of Academic Achievement of High Socio
Economic Status and Low Socio Economic
Status Students

300

250

200

150

100

50

0 N Standard

Error

M e an

High SES Low SES

Figure 3 Academic Achievement
Scores of High and Low Socio Economic
Status Students
df=300,*significant at5%
The above table shows that the total number of
High Socio Economic Status category students
ANOVA Table 4
Comparisons of Academic Achievement
scores of Low, Average and High Socio
Economic Status Students

are 263. The mean of the Academic achievement score of students of High Socio economic status is 74.91 and Standard Deviation is 9.484.The Standard Error mean of students of high SES is 0.585. The low Socio Economic Status category students are 39 in number. The mean of the academic achievement score of the students of low socio economic status is 52.62 and Standard Deviation of low socio economic status students is 11.329. The S.Em. of students of low socio economic status is 1.814. The t-value between high SES category and low SES
category secondary school students are 13.344
at 300 degree of freedom which is significant at
0.05 level of significance, hence the null hypothesis is rejected. It means that there is a significant difference between Academic achievement of high Socio Economic Status category and low Socio Economic Status category secondary school students .

Vineeta Trivedi (1988) in her study of the

relationship of parental attitude, socio economic background and their academic achievement found that students of upper SES showed better achievement than the students of lower SES group. The result is depicted below in figure 3:
In Table4 Academic Achievement scores of students of low, average and high Socio economic status are compared. The number students in Low SES category are 39,in Average SES category 312 and in High SES category are 263.The mean of the academic achievement scores of students of low average and high SES category are 52.62, 64.48 and
74.91. The Standard Deviation of students of
Low SES is 11.329, Average SES is 10.696 and High SES is 9.484.A comparison of T-values is also shown in Table4.The t-value between low and high SES is 13.344, between low and average SES is 6.487 and between high and average SES is 12.265. The results are depicted in figure 4 below

International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 4, Issue 12, December-2013 1958

ISSN 2229-5518

differ significantly in their Academic

Achievement .

350

300

250

200

150

100

low

Averag e

High

70000

60000

50000

40000

30000

20000

10000

0 sum of

mean

between groups

within groups

squares

square

N tvalue high

Figure 4 Comparative Academic Achievement scores of Low, Average and High Socio
Economic Status Students
Figure 5 Summary of Analysis of Variance in
respect to Socio Economic Status and
Academic achievement

Correlation Analysis

Correlation Analysis between Dependent variable Academic Achievement and
Table 5
Independent Variable Socio economic Status
The study considers the dependent variable
Summary of Analysis of Variance in respect to
Socio Economic Status and Academic achievement
ANOVA
academic achievement independent variable socio economic status. To find out the relationship between the socio economic status of the secondary school students and their academic achievement is one of the objectives of the study. To study the ionship between the academic vement and socio economic status Karl
son’s correlation coefficient technique was ied and relationship was measured.
*Significant at 5% level
In table 5, sum of squares between groups is
25632.439 and within groups is 64020.884. The value for mean squares between groups is
12816.219 and within groups it is 104.780 .The
value of F is highly significant at
122.315.(f=122.315* <0.05) Hence the null
hypothesis that there is no significant difference between SES and Academic achievement of secondary school students is rejected. The three categories of Socio economic status of secondary school students
le6
Relationship between Academic Achievement
of Secondary school students and their socio economic status
N=614
**. Correlation is significant at the
0.01 level (2-tailed).

International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 4, Issue 12, December-2013 1959

ISSN 2229-5518

The table 6 clearly shows a high degree of positive correlation between socio economic status and academic achievement of secondary school students.(r=0.580)*.The result of the present study is got support from the findings of White, Karl R. (1982) and Muhammad Maqsuad and Sepideh Rouhani (1991) Brent M Blevins in his study on the relationship between SES and academic achievement used Karl Pearsons r and which supports the result as well.
Therefore the null hypothesis that there is no
significant relationship between Academic
Achievement of secondary school students and their socio economic status is rejected and alternative hypothesis is accepted at p<0.01 In other words there is a significant positive correlation between academic achievement and socio economic status of secondary school students.
excellent facilities and infrastructure. They are taught by trained and experienced teachers.
This helps them in enhancing their academic achievement. A child with high SES and Average intelligence will also give good result as compared to Low SES & high intelligence, as the child would be deprived of basic facilities for sharpening and honing his talent. He will not have the opportunity to project his intelligence. Hence the null hypothesis is rejected.

Limitations of the study

The study is limited to 14 schools of lucknow city, Uttar Pradesh in India. Hence the results cannot be generalized. All aspects of the variables are not covered due to shortage of time and resources.

References:

IJSER

Findings and Conclusions

The results of the study show that socio economic status of the students influences their academic achievement. There is a difference between high SES and Average SES category students. Students belonging to high SES category have higher Academic achievement as compared to average SES students. The High SES students have better exposure and environment. They go to schools with excellent infrastructure and facilities. The teachers, tutors and guidance of parents are also available to them. They have healthy environment for improving their academic achievement. The null hypothesis is rejected.
In comparison to Low SES category Average
SES category students show higher academic
achievement. Academic achievement is positively related to socio economic status. Low SES category students are deprived of good schools and outstanding guidance. Due to their meagre resources they cannot work to increase their academic achievement.
There is a stark contrast, between, high SES
and Low SES category students in their academic achievement. The students belonging to high SES go to schools with
1. Baharudin , Rozumah and Tom Luster,
“Factors related to the quality of the home environment and children’s achievement”, Journal of Family Issues, Vol 19,no.4,pp. 375-403, 1998
2. Eamon, Mary Keegan, ”Social-
demographic, school, neighborhood, and parenting influences on academic achievement of Latino young adolescents”, Journal of Youth and Adolescence, vol. 34, no.2, pp. 163-175,
2005.
3. Jeynes, William H., “Examining the
effects of parental absence on the
academic achievement of adolescents: the challenge of controlling for family income”, Journal of Family and Economic Issues vol. 23,no.2, 2002
4. Majoribanks, Kevin, “Family Learning Environments and Students’ Outcomes: A Review”, Journal of Comparitive Family Studies vol 27 no.2 ,pp. 373-394, 1996.
5. McNeal, Ralph B, “Differential effects of
parental involvement on cognitive and behavioral outcomes by socioeconomic status”, Journal of Socio-Economics vol 30, no.2, pp. 171, 2001.
6. Hochschild, Jennifer L, “Social Class in

International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 4, Issue 12, December-2013 1960

ISSN 2229-5518

Public Schools”, Journal of Social Issues, vol. 59,no.4,pp. 821-840, 2003.
7. Seyfried, Sherri.F,”Academic achievement of African American preadolescents: The influence of teacher perceptions”, American Journal of Community Psychology, vol.

26, no.3, pp. 381-402, 1998.

8. Crnic, K., and Lamberty, G.,
“Reconsidering school readiness: Conceptual and applied perspectives”, Early Education and Development ,vol.5, no.2, pp.91-
105, ,April 1994
9. Zill , N., Collins, M., West, J., & Hausken , E.G., “School readiness and children's developmental status,” ERIC

Digest [Online],December,1995.

10. White K.R. (1982), “The relationship between socio economic status and
academic achievement,” Pschological
F., et al, “Equality of Educational
Opportunity”, 1966.
16. Sirin, S.R. “Socio Economic Status and Academic Achievement: A Meta- analytic Review of Research”, Review of Educational Research,vol.75,no.3, pp.
417-453, 2005.
17. Brooks-Gunn, J., Duncan, G.J. “The Effect of Poverty on Children. The Future of Children”, vol. 7,no.2, pp.55-
71, 1997.
18. Bornstein, M.C., & Bradley, R.H., “Socio
Economic Status, Parenting and Child Development”. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 2003.
19. Mohammad Maqsud and Sepideh
Rouhani, “Relationship between Socio
Economic Status, Locus of Control, Self- concept and Academic Achievement of Batswana Adoloscents” Journal of Youth and Adoloscents, vol. 20,no.1pp.
107-114, 1991.

IJSER

Bulletin,91(3), 461-481
11. Ganguly, Malabika “Socio economic
status and scholastic achievement”, Indian Educational Review, vol.24,no.1,pp. 84-94,1989
12. Trivedi Vineeta “A Study of the Relationship of Parental Attitude, Socio Economic background and the feeling of security among the intermediate students and their academic achievement”, Ph.D , Education, University of Lucknow,
1988.
13. Borbora, Rupadas, “Influence of
Parental Literacy on the Academic
Achievements of Children belonging to the Backward Classes: A Study of Kamrup District”, Journal of Indian Education”,pp. 59-65, 2001
14. McConney, Andrew, Perry, Laura B, “Socio Economic Status Self Efficacy and Mathematics Achievement in Australia: A Secondary Analysis”, Educational Research Policy Practice, pp.77-91, 2010
15. Coleman, J., Campbell, E, Hobson, C.,
McPartland, J., Mood, A., Weinfield,
20. Brent M, Blevins “Effects of Socio
Economic Status on Academic
Performance in Missouri Public
Schools”, Pro Quest Dissertation, 2009.

• Ritu Chandra is currently a Research Scholar puruing Ph.D in Education from Integral University, Lucknow, India

• Prof. (Dr. ) Shaikh Azimuddin is Dean, Faculty of

Education, Integral University, Lucknow, India