International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 3, Issue 11, November-2012 1
ISSN 2229-5518
Sheetal Punjani, Dr. Bharat Jethava, Dr.Preeti Shrivastava
—————————— ——————————
The normal mice lenses were round and soft with prominent convex posterior pole. It is located between anterior aqueous and posterior vitreous humour. It is a semi-solid, elastic, avascular highly organized cellular organ with smooth, shiny surface. The lens capsule was observed to be thinner at the posterior pole. The lenses show a non-cellular capsule layer consisting of two portions. The capsule appeared homogeneous in section, suggesting that the non-cellular capsule layer uniformly surrounds the lens fibers. The cortical lens fibers lens fibers were generally flattened and uniformly hexagonal in transverse section and elongated belt like cells. The nuclear fibers were highly compact and closely packed.
The amount of fructose content in the lens (in vitro and in vivo) of UV-exposed and control animals were estimated using the method of Foreman et al. (1973).
When the fructose of the homogenate is heated with 30% HCl, it is converted to oxy-methyl furfural which gives a red color complex with the resorcinol solution. The intensity of the color is proportional to the concentration.
Fructose levels in the lens of UV irradiated cultured rat lenses and their controls at different duration of exposure are shown in the given Table I. fructose level in control lens were found to increase with advancing age. In the later stages the fructose levels in UV-exposed eye lenses in the in vitro experiments were found. The results indicate alterations in the carbohydrate metabolism in the crystalline lens brought by UV-radiation, associated with progressive lenticular changes.
————————————————
Sheetal Punjani – Pursuing Ph.D. from Mahatma Jyoti Rao Phoole
University, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India. Email – sheetal273@yahoo.com
Guide – Dr. Bharat Jethva, email – drbharat.jethva@gmail.com
Co-Guide – Dr. Preeti Shrivastava
IJSER © 2012
International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 3, Issue 11, November-2012 2
ISSN 2229-5518
PARAMETER | EXPERIMENTAL TIME/ AGE (IN WEEKS) | |||||
PARAMETER | 7/11 | 15/19 | 25/29 | |||
PARAMETER | CONTROL | TREATED | CONTROL | TREATED | CONTROL | TREATED |
Fructose (g/mg wet wt) | 0.539 0.01 (6) | 0.554 0.008 (6) | 0.562 0.013 (7) | 0.587 0.011 (7), A | 0.617 0.008 (7) | 0.653 0.008 (7), D |
(Values are Mean S.E. Numbers in parentheses indicates sample size, p-values: A: <0.2, D: <0.01)
The results obtained from the investigation shows that in the UV-exposed lenses There was slightly significant increase of fructose level in in vivo while highly significant increase in cultured UV irradiated lenses. Associated with the progression of UV induced lens opacity, considerable change in the maintenance of lens sugar level was obtained. A considerable increase (p<0.01 to p<0.001) in the content of fructose was noted in the progressive UV induced opacity (in vivo and in vitro) fructose accumulates at increasingly higher levels (Kuck, 1965) because it does not penetrate the lens as easily as glucose.
From the data studied it could be concluded that long-term, low-level radiation exposure has salient effects on the crystalline lens, which enhances cataractogenesis. The biochemical change for the different duration of UV- exposure includes increase in Fructose. The study suggests that radiation causes a permanent lenticular damage which leads to irreversible lens opacity and support the concept that being in closed cavity lens has no repair mechanism for damage caused by radiation.
Alcala, J. and Maisel, H. (1985): Biochemistry of lens plasma membranes and cytoskeleton. In: The ocular lens, Ed. Maisel, H., Marccel Dekker, New York, pp.
169
De Gruijl, F.R. (1997). Health effects from solar UV
radiation. Radiation Protection Dosimetry 72:177-
196.
De Jong, W.W. (1981): In molecular and cell biology of the lens (Bloemendal, H. ed) Johnley and Sons, New York, pp. 221-278
Harding, J.J. (1991): “Cataract” biochemistry, epidemiology and pharmacology. Publ. Chapman and Hall, London.
Hollows, F., Moran D. (1981): Cataract the ultraviolet risk factor, Lancet. 1249 – 1251
Kinoshita, J.H. (1974): Mechanism of cataract formation. Invest Ophthal. Vis Sci. 18: 713 – 724.
Kuck, J.F.R. (1965): Carbohydrates of the lens in normal and pre-cataractous state. Invest. Ophthalmol, 4: 638
Pirie, A. (1956): Biochemical changes in radiation cataract. Trans. Ophthal. Soc. U.K. 76: 461 – 475
Somogyi, M. (1945): Determination of blood sugar, J.
Biol. chem. 160:69.
Zigman, S., Datiles, M. and Torczynski, E. (1979): Sunlight and human cataracts Invest. Ophthalmol. And Vis. Sci. 18: 462-467
IJSER © 2012